What are the recent hot spots? We don't know about other circles, but the headlines in the automotive circle are definitely Tesla suing a platform of tens of millions of fans (account name @ Xiaogang Xuechang), the reason for the lawsuit is that the latter uses the information network to carry out defamation.
At present, this news has been officially responded to by tesla's relevant departments, "there is indeed this matter", and on January 26, it was officially filed with the court.
Recharge just got into a lawsuit for licking customers
First of all, the attitude is that Tesla has frequent braking problems in recent years, although there are artificial factors for some car owners, but the specific causes of many accidents, Tesla has not yet made a clear statement. In addition, Tesla has also been criticized by name by the Chinese Consumer Association recently, and indeed Tesla's handling of some issues is debatable or even slightly excessive.
However, the behavior of "Xiao Gang Senior" rubbing heat, fabricating facts, deliberately smearing, and triggering public opinion has made the title of car critic almost equivalent to cursing. Cases like Tesla's have triggered a nationwide crusade against "Xiao Gang Senior" and his team.
Looking back at this incident, the cause of the incident was that "Xiao Gang Senior" released two test videos on April 29 and 30, 2021, respectively, for the Tesla Model 3 and Xiaopeng P7 emergency braking test, respectively, installed a paper car in the lane and inflatable dummy to test the emergency braking function of the vehicle, and the final "test" results showed that Tesla Model 3 failed to brake and crash into the paper car and dummy, while xiaopeng P7 was perfect emergency braking brake.
First of all, rubbing the hot spot is definitely a real hammer, the video release time coincided with the Tesla female owner of the Shanghai Auto Show, when Tesla was deeply involved in the brake door problem.
Seriously, Tesla Model 3 and Xiaopeng P7 are people's own, is the mule is a horse out of the slip, send a video you can see, this no one will "net violence" you.
But the problem is that during the test, "Xiao Gang Senior" secretly stepped on the electric door when testing the Tesla Model 3, the detail is that the Tesla screen can display the status of the electric door and kinetic energy recovery, and the Tesla Model 3 in front of the crash into the paper car, the energy bar of the car still shows that there is still power output.
In fact, the main test is the automatic emergency braking function, also known as AEB. The function is to be able to monitor the driving environment in front of the vehicle in real time, and automatically activate the vehicle braking system to slow down the vehicle when there is a risk of collision, so as to avoid collisions or mitigate the consequences of collisions.
First of all, in the AEB test process, the test obstacle needs to consider three points, radar characteristics, reflectivity, and visual characteristics. In simple terms, it is that the test paper of "Little Gang Senior" does not meet the standard. The most critical point is that during the test, he is still stepping on the electric door, "equivalent to telling the car, nothing to hit it." ”
In other words, it is also a real hammer to say that "Xiao Gang Xuechang" fabricated facts, deliberately smeared, and triggered public opinion. Tesla Model 3 and Xiaopeng P7's AEB automatic emergency braking function test, in the end who is the profiteer. A word and you to make it clear, Tesla has no communication costs, Xiaopeng is really there, what is going on, you taste, you taste. Recharge just hammered, lick really thoroughly.
Although you say that you are a car critic, you want to popularize a little knowledge with you. Tesla can remotely retrieve driving information, which can be accurate to the time of your test, stepping on the electric door, and there is background data support. Another point is that Tesla expanded its PR team and legal team last year.
You think carefully, if the Tesla legal team does not have real hammer evidence, how can it file a lawsuit against you, after all, you are a big Internet celebrity. I just don't know if the advertising fee given by Xiaopeng is 5 million.
Self-exposure grievances are still pretentious
At the time of the rapid fermentation of Tesla's lawsuit, "Xiao gang senior" released a video, the main content of which covers the fact that he is an internet celebrity, and many people say that he is staring at him, deliberately smearing the problem of rubbing traffic. At the same time, for example, YYP's three-cylinder desert video, which was attacked by the Internet.
Seriously, throughout the video, you're talking about someone deliberately smearing you. But you didn't say anything about the incident itself, and you obviously wanted to guide public opinion in the direction of being attacked by the Internet. Brother, if you are really afraid of Internet violence, just explain the problem clearly, and as if you have not done anything that has fallen into the well, otherwise why do so many people stand up and spray you.
However, just as the so-called popularity is not much, can Tesla let go of a tens of millions of internet celebrities like you? Winning you is more cost-effective than how much of the communication budget is.
Besides, you've just pulled out a radish, covered in dirty mud. In addition to "sneaking on the electric door to measure the brakes", as a senior water army of ideal cars, you have sent a video stating the ideal ONE retention rate problem, and then you were punched in the face by a number of second-hand car dealers. To tell the truth, you can't really influence the retention rate of a car, it belongs to the aunt who is jumping high, overestimating yourself.
Of course, there is also the "Facing the Wind" series, a variety of luxury supercars deliberately crashed, and then carried out fancy repairs, until the latest M4 play off, only summed up "facing the wind".
What is a car reviewer? As the leader of the new industry said, there are many people who like cars, but what we need is people who are responsible for users, and every article, every report, and every video may affect the final choice of a user. Every user's money is not blown by the wind, because your words lead to a wrong choice and will be poked in the spine.
Therefore, although Tesla has many problems itself, and has not given domestic users a reasonable official explanation, under the premise of the rapid rise of short videos, it still chooses to sue tens of millions of Internet celebrities, which also plays a positive role in eliminating the chaos of "bald monkey pigs" in the automobile circle. There is no nutrition at all, either the leg is exposed or funny, and the "car reviewer" in the mouth of the Internet celebrity is really laughing.