Originally, this topic has passed, but with the "stealing on the accelerator to measure the brakes" of a senior, it was paid attention to by Tesla's legal department and pushed to a new height.
It is still a cliché of three topics: 1, Tesla price cut is not called cutting leeks, 2, Tesla brakes have no problems, 3, Tesla sued the three views of the problem, spread improper energy, vent private anger of car critics, is there a problem?
Let's answer the first and easiest question to talk about: Tesla's price reduction is not called cutting leeks.
You don't want Tesla to cut prices, don't you still want it to increase its price? At the beginning of Model3's domestic production, the production cost of the product was greatly reduced, and the price fell again and again, and the lowest valley fell below 250,000.
Some people say that Tesla is cutting leeks, and I said "You don't want it to cut prices, are you happy when it goes up"? Now model 3 really because of the cost of the price of people, do not want Tesla to reduce the price of people, this wave of Tesla price increases, no one said that Tesla once cut leeks.
If a company is priced according to cost, rather than a dead set of guidance prices, the company actually did not get praise, but was tied to the hat of cutting leeks, I think it is not Tesla's problem, but the values of this society are problematic.
Once I wanted to see the price integration at home and abroad, rather than the sky-high price strategy of Mercedes-Benz and Lexus, Tesla achieved the integration of prices at home and abroad, and was actually pushed to the hot search and scolded to cut leeks.
The second question: Is there a problem with Tesla's brakes and driver assistance systems.
Henan female car owners "big fuss Shanghai Auto Show" stimulated a very strong technical discussion, technical analysis we do not discuss, but in the process of discussing technology has spawned some "venting private anger" car critics, such as a recently pulled out of a certain senior, just in the amateur test Model car brakes deliberately stepped on the brakes.
Then conclude that Tesla can't brake.
Regarding the conclusion that Tesla's brakes are not OK, the technical analysis is its own, from the current Tesla in the Chinese market about 500,000 Model cars in the environment, a large number of brakes normal work case illustrates a point: if only a test can detect brake failure, then go directly home to buy lottery tickets.
It is worth mentioning that after Tesla's legal department began to sue the problem car reviewers, the car critics' so-called "fight for justice against Tesla action" almost disappeared.
Those car reviewers who once tested a quasi-Tesla brake failure not only removed the previous test content, but also shut up about the Tesla brake incident.
The last one is better analyzed.
Any enterprise, any unit, anyone has the right to safeguard their legitimate rights and interests, the court will always be more able to rectify the industry atmosphere than to ignore it, for Tesla, to protect their legitimate rights and interests, is there a problem?
Adults, to be responsible for what they say and do, when you start to vent your anger and deliberately smear the company, you should be prepared for the company to sue you and make you claim.
Of course, some companies were willing to spend money privately before, but if every company is like this, is it also fueling the arrogance of the problem?