More than a year has passed since the Tesla female owner's "roof rights protection" incident, and the Zhang woman also posted a document in February 2022 to continue to defend her rights, saying in the article that "the complete background data of the vehicle is still not obtained." For Ms. Zhang, whether Tesla's brakes are really faulty, it may not be possible to check this year, because at present, it is indeed Tesla's suspicion that it is more suspicious, otherwise it will not provide the complete background data of the vehicle. Of course, this is only Uncle Che's speculation, and the final conclusion is subject to the court's ruling.
In the past 2021, Tesla's legal department can be described as a big killing, not only through litigation to sue many rights protection car owners, but also through the way of sending lawyer letters to knock a number of self-media, so it won the title of "the most cattle legal department", then Tesla legal department in 2021 What are the "achievements"?
In August 2020, Mr. Chen, a Tesla owner in Wenzhou, was driving his Tesla Model 3 and suddenly accelerated about 100 meters from the parking lot, and the vehicle immediately rushed into the parking lot, crashing dozens of cars before stopping, and later announced that the vehicle suddenly accelerated because it was out of control. For this accident and Mr. Chen's remarks, Tesla chose to sue Mr. Chen and won the lawsuit, demanding that Mr. Chen use his account number on platforms such as Douyin to apologize to Tesla for 90 days and compensate 50,000 yuan.
In September 2021, Mr. Han, the owner of Shanghai Tesla, sued Tesla in court because Tesla sold a major accident car to him, and finally the court sentenced Tesla to "refund one for three", and needed to refund a total of 1.5188 million yuan to Mr. Han, but Tesla expressed dissatisfaction and immediately filed an appeal.
On December 24, 2021, Tesla's "roof protection" female car claimant ms. sued Tesla (Shanghai) Co., Ltd., Tesla Motors (Beijing) Co., Ltd., Tesla Company's global vice president Tao Lin's reputation dispute, which was heard at the Beiguan District People's Court in Anyang City, Henan Province, and the case was not pronounced in court. In August 2021, Ms. Zhang also received a pre-litigation mediation consultation notice from the Shanghai Qingpu District People's Court, and Ms. Zhang said that Tesla also filed a lawsuit against her.
From Ms. Zhang's recent post and the above three cases, Tesla's legal department is not a hundred battles, in addition to Mr. Chen's case in Wenzhou finally confirmed that it was a vehicle out of control caused by mistakenly stepping on the accelerator pedal, the latter two cases Tesla legal department did not win, "selling a major accident car" case The court has sentenced Tesla to "refund one loss three", but Tesla is not satisfied, and the "roof rights protection" incident has become a pot of porridge until now, if Tesla can not provide complete background data, Then this case will be delayed again and again, which is a major challenge for the energy and financial resources of the owners of rights protection vehicles.
No matter which enterprise, the establishment of the legal department is very normal, mainly to protect the reputation and interests of the enterprise from infringement, but it is rare for Tesla to disagree with the court's judgment, and it is not in accordance with the rules to delay the disclosure of complete background data in the "roof protection" incident. Therefore, Tesla's establishment of the legal department seems to be used to block the mouth of the owner, seeing that the rights protection is so difficult, some car owners are not willing to spend time and energy to rip it off, after all, even if the lawsuit is won, tesla's legal department may continue to appeal against the court judgment, such a large company can easily drag down ordinary consumers.
Uncle Che summed up
No one wants to buy their own car has a fault, but no one can ensure that their car will not fail, when the vehicle has brake failure, roof leakage, car machine Caton and other non-human-caused problems, the owner of the first time to think of the solution is to contact the 4S shop after-sales, if you can not solve it, then through the legal channels to protect rights, in fact, less than the last resort Consumers do not want to fight a lawsuit, after all, time-consuming, laborious and expensive, if you encounter unreasonable enterprises, it is really dumb to eat Yellow Lian - there is bitterness to say. In the final analysis, it is still the mainland consumers' legal awareness is not strong enough, and the consumer protection law is not perfect enough, which allows some unscrupulous enterprises to exploit loopholes.