There were once two legal departments that were very sharp, one was Nintendo and the other was Disney, and there were many paragraphs circulating on the Internet. Nowadays, there is also a legal department in the automotive circle that has repeatedly come out of the circle, it is Tesla's legal department, the so-called car red is not much, Tesla's high sales halo contains abundant traffic passwords, so that countless people are fascinated.
In fact, throughout 2021, Tesla is non-continuous, the beginning is the Shanghai Auto Show in April, the strange rights protection incident began to erupt, until the end of the year a well-known car critic tested the brake incident, almost every month there are Tesla things on the hot search. It was also from that time that Tesla's legal department began to enter the public's sight, using the law to maintain its own brand image, so that everyone could see Tesla's attitude.
Recently, Tesla's legal department has gone to the next city. It is reported that "Tesla sued Shenzhou Dai-driving and Micro-Driving Platform Drivers for Reputation Infringement The verdict was announced, and the court ruled that the defendant's driving driver apologized to the plaintiff Tesla (Shanghai) Co., Ltd. on the account used on the Douyin platform and its WeChat circle of friends within 10 days from the effective date of the judgment, and continued for not less than 30 days; compensated the plaintiff for economic losses and reasonable expenses for rights protection totaling 20,000 yuan." ”
In fact, this matter is also the fermentation of the Shanghai Auto Show rights protection incident, when the rights protection incident appeared, Changsha Shenzhou dai-driving, micro-driving platform chauffeur-driven drivers produced a large advertisement, saying that due to Tesla brake quality problems, Tesla brand cars were refused to provide driving services. In fact, from the perspective of the matter itself, the core principle of these two driving companies is to borrow this reason to promote themselves, and in the face of such a situation, Tesla's legal department once again intervened and won.
It can be seen that the law has justified Tesla's name, after all, an overseas car company can protect its rights and interests through the laws of the mainland, and the result is enough to explain some problems. The fairness and rigor of mainland law are believed to be convincing, and the subsequent apologies also prove that there is indeed a problem with the original motives of the two companies.
In fact, as a media person, I am well aware that the so-called "negative" in the automotive media circle is flocking to it, and the negative can bring good traffic and attention, which also makes the majority of auto media pursue the negative to a "pathological" degree. In fact, as a media, the responsibility for the real negative existence of the report, for the manufacturer media also has the obligation to supervise. But we can't create a negative and create a so-called vehicle problem for the sake of bo traffic, which in itself has deviated from the principle of fairness and objectivity of the media.
In fact, not only Tesla, many car manufacturers have always been uncompromising in their attitude towards the "manufacturing" of the negative. A few days ago, BYD issued an announcement on the time of "spontaneous combustion" of its vehicles, and has to investigate the relevant responsible persons, and it will become more difficult to "negatively" coerce manufacturers to compromise or profit from them in the future, and it will definitely pay a price.