Alas, the current car circle is more and more inward-rolling, and it is getting worse and worse to mix!
Open the network video, you can see a lot of Internet car celebrities in each other's fights, you say that his evaluation is unfair, he said that you have a problem with your position; you say that his evaluation parameters are not right, he said that you are not professional enough; you say that he has no conscience to make money, he said that your motives are not pure... And so on, even to the point of personal attack. There are also a variety of zoos to say cars, beautiful women to pick up cars, repairmen to say cars, etc., can objectively and fairly say the car is very few, almost all with a variety of extreme remarks to attract attention, create anxiety, not surprisingly dead, to you every day to pass on a car destroying tips. Even the most rigorous automotive engineers have now begun to entertain, and it is good to say that the car is not technical, and it is necessary to get a big beautiful woman to scratch her head in front of the front to attract everyone's attention.
There are also all kinds of dismantling cars, holding a caliper, a magnet, seeing that aluminum is high-grade, seeing iron is reduced, thick is good, thin, thin is poor, and then compare which car materials are thick, which cars are seriously reduced, and use this as a standard to determine which cars are good and which cars are bad... If car design and manufacturing is so simple, domestic cars should have long been the first in the world, what else should those research and evaluation institutions do?
There are all kinds of violent car destruction, what rolling hills, jumping big rivers, falling from high places, crashing trucks..... Wait, wait, how to come with violence, how to attract attention, how to come. Then based on these results, we will evaluate which cars are safe and which cars are not. You say this is not? If car safety is evaluated in this way, the IIHS in the United States, the E-NCAP in Europe, the J-NCAP in Japan, the China Insurance Research Institute (C-IASI) in China, and the China Automobile Research Institute (C-NCAP) do not need to exist. In fact, this kind of violent car destruction test, just like the old society on the rivers and lakes to sell art, what naked lying nail board, chest crushing stones, throat top steel bars, etc., such kung fu is purely eye-catching, there is no practical value.
Alas, the world is so noisy, how rare is the truth! Now on the Internet, it is obvious that there are too many scammers and too many fools to use. The purpose of competing for traffic is not to serve the majority of netizens to raise cars and cars, nor to spread knowledge to improve the quality of the people, but to drain and make money. We ordinary car owners, just be a melon eater, move a small bench to see the liveliness, do not be taken astray, hot head to give people standing to cheer, waving the flag and shouting, not to mention donating money and donations were cut leeks to collect IQ tax. If we really can't tell the difference between right and wrong, follow the maintenance manual, which is the last barrier to protect us.