laitimes

Is it the original sin to be born without nurturing? The incurable childhood in "What a Home" is actually an original sin for parents born and not raised in court when there is an objectively incurable childhood

author:Little fun to talk about entertainment
Is it the original sin to be born without nurturing? The incurable childhood in "What a Home" is actually an original sin for parents born and not raised in court when there is an objectively incurable childhood
Lucky people heal their whole lives with childhood, and unfortunate people heal their childhood with a lifetime.

Is it a sin to be born without support, someone is born in Rome, and I can only live in hell, can you imagine going out to work at the age of twelve? Can you feel the pain of getting married at eleven?

May every brave child be treated properly by the world, in this film it is just a joke, the parents are lowly educated, do not know what "family planning" is, they can only rely on the non-stop birth of children, for their own benefits, they say in court how difficult their lives are, how ridiculous it is for moviegoers.

Is it the original sin to be born without nurturing? The incurable childhood in "What a Home" is actually an original sin for parents born and not raised in court when there is an objectively incurable childhood

The level of depressiveness of the whole film is unimaginable, it is a film set in the background of war. Because of the war, refugees spread all over Lebanon, and the protagonist, the little boy, was one of them, and the war caused their family to wander around, and the turbulent and displaced life made him maturer than his peers from an early age.

Separation of flesh and bones is the norm of war, and the film depicts it not very cryptically, but it cuts the real war in half. To know how many street children were in Lebanon at that time, they had to earn a living from begging in the streets, illegal labor, violent cruelty, almost a close-up of that era.

Is it the original sin to be born without nurturing? The incurable childhood in "What a Home" is actually an original sin for parents born and not raised in court when there is an objectively incurable childhood

Zane lives in an environment where his parents are only born and not raised, and they rely on constant reproduction to maintain their strength. They are poor, but the poorer they like to have children, the continuation of incense is just an excuse, their mistakes need to be paid for by five children, which is the most grasping point of human nature.

Grandiose words, scolding children, 12-year-old Zane used to work to subsidize the family, 11 daughters used to marry in exchange for a few months of rations, the remaining few are too small, raising a child may be able to find their value, children are never expected to be born, each of them has a mission.

Is it the original sin to be born without nurturing? The incurable childhood in "What a Home" is actually an original sin for parents born and not raised in court when there is an objectively incurable childhood

One of the most depressing points in the film is that my sister was sent away by her mother because of her menstrual leave. You can imagine that this is just an 11-year-old child, listening to the girl's pleading and the boy's hoarse retention, but how can the child fight the adult, the sister is sent away, and Zane is disappointed in the family.

He began to wander, he hated this mother like a reproductive machine, disgusted that they used their children as a means of gaining profit, a 12-year-old child, a thin figure, he wandered the streets, there was no adult to help him, in this brutal society, he was like a duckweed who did not recognize his life, fluttering and not wanting to appoint.

Is it the original sin to be born without nurturing? The incurable childhood in "What a Home" is actually an original sin for parents born and not raised in court when there is an objectively incurable childhood

But what Zane didn't expect was that after he wandered home, he found that his favorite sister had died of pregnancy.

The news made Zane angry, he thought he was already sober, but his sister's death made him feel confused, and he angrily took a knife and stabbed the so-called brother-in-law.

"I'm going to sue my parents because they gave birth to me" is a direct tear-jerker, and few people say that even children in the rebellious period know that their parents are not wrong except for loving themselves and nagging too much.

Is it the original sin to be born without nurturing? The incurable childhood in "What a Home" is actually an original sin for parents born and not raised in court when there is an objectively incurable childhood

But this 12-year-old boy actually said such a sentence in court, the child will also be tired, he will be desperate and numb in life, he will issue his last roar, you can feel his helplessness, you can also feel that he is actually guilty of his sister.

He used this way to fight against his parents, hoping that the children behind him, not to experience such a tragedy as him, and also hoped that they would not be like his sister, becoming a tool for their parents to make a living, even if he is now a criminal, but I also think he is the cleanest criminal.

Is it the original sin to be born without nurturing? The incurable childhood in "What a Home" is actually an original sin for parents born and not raised in court when there is an objectively incurable childhood

There had been a thousand ways to make Zane bad, family factors that could make him a robber, social factors that could make him a murderous maniac, but he didn't, the only impulse was that his beloved sister was gone, how innocent he was.

But from Zane's parents' perspective, they felt that what they were doing was common sense. As an illegal immigrant, they have no source of income, but children are born in their stomachs and they have the right to resettle them to support themselves.

They were both pathetic and pathetic, selling their daughters to traders as wives, becoming pregnant at a young age until they died innocently. If you're not there, you can't feel the pressure of this film at all, and they directly dissect the worst parts of human nature.

Is it the original sin to be born without nurturing? The incurable childhood in "What a Home" is actually an original sin for parents born and not raised in court when there is an objectively incurable childhood

Watching them cry in court, give them a chance to start again in time, or let them be reborn with their memories, they will still not hesitate to sell their daughters, because they want to live, they need money to reproduce a substitute for another daughter.

In the face of praise, the mother seemed very aggrieved, he thought that the son did not understand their hardships. In an unfamiliar country, they are at the bottom of society, they have no source of income, their sons have not experienced their lives, why judge them?

Is it the original sin to be born without nurturing? The incurable childhood in "What a Home" is actually an original sin for parents born and not raised in court when there is an objectively incurable childhood

But the funny thing is, since you don't want them to go through your life, why do you have to be born one after another? Even if they can't help themselves, the surrounding environment makes them have to make such a decision, but they are adults, can they really learn not to refrain?

When the story comes to an end, zane, who is wandering, has a new partner at this time, after Hill's arrest, after taking Rahil's 1-year-old son to start wandering, during this time desperate things happen.

He began to become depressed, he began to struggle, he could not even save himself, he could not raise a child, so he made some moves to lock Yunus in the street, and finally, like his parents, sold Yunus to a trafficking agency.

He had no choice as a child, and after becoming an "adult", he still had no choice, he needed money in exchange for Yunus, he needed to live, in such a world, no one is not a victim.

Is it the original sin to be born without nurturing? The incurable childhood in "What a Home" is actually an original sin for parents born and not raised in court when there is an objectively incurable childhood

The birth of each new life represents a little heavier burden on the body, at this time, we are no longer individuals, we are a family, we need to help each other to raise this little friend.

We need to teach him the truth of life, teach him the language of teeth and teeth, but this process is risky, the degree of risk can not be estimated, and whether this will still be as we wish, it is also an unknown thing.

Is it the original sin to be born without nurturing? The incurable childhood in "What a Home" is actually an original sin for parents born and not raised in court when there is an objectively incurable childhood

But there are always people who are reluctant to take risks, who are not willing to accept their achievements as failures, but are the traditional parents who conceive in October really "saints"? Of course not, their sometimes practices often ruin their work.

"Who made you give birth to me?" Did I agree? This is a question that many TV dramas can hear, but we will never find the answer, but we can understand that if you "take" your child to this world of beauty and suffering without his consent, are parents responsible for it?

Is it the original sin to be born without nurturing? The incurable childhood in "What a Home" is actually an original sin for parents born and not raised in court when there is an objectively incurable childhood

If you are not prepared to give him all the warmth and due care, maybe your work will be much better than others. Do your best to educate him and make him a person with a sound personality, which is the most important thing every parent should do!

Thank you for watching, paying attention to me, and taking you to learn more entertainment stories!

Read on