Huawei is not the first, it is definitely a wild list!
Since the United States revised the chip rules and caused Huawei to suffer a heavy blow, the netizen group on the Internet has been born if Huawei is not targeted by the United States, it has already surpassed Apple. Whether this understanding is correct or whether it can withstand the test, we have no way of knowing. But even so, this knowledge has spread wildly on major social interaction platforms in a very short period of time with the convenience of the Internet! Under the cross-influence of position factors, environmental factors and public opinion factors, many people are convinced of this cognition and hold high praises to Huawei, so far, Huawei canonized the gods! As a native domestic brand, Huawei's overnight sealing of the gods is obviously a very good thing for our side. However, from the current point of view, Huawei's sealing of the gods and surpassing Apple is not a good thing in the eyes of some people!
Not a good thing? Why? Because under the influence of the Internet economy, many companies and brands are taking shortcuts or overtaking corners! What does that mean? Take Huawei's surpassing Apple, if there is no U.S. target, can Huawei surpass Apple? Sure! This is the view of netizens on the Internet, and I think, not necessarily! The impact of the United States on Huawei is indeed very large, but we can push the timeline forward to the advent of Huawei's first smartphone, please ask from that node to the node that Huawei was targeted, in which year did Huawei's revenue and net profit surpass Apple? Why should I use revenue and net profit to prove instead of Huawei's "ironclad" sales and share of Apple? To give a real-life example, why would you want to spend money on gifts for the girl you want and be nice to her? The purpose is to please her and get her to agree to associate with you, right? So in the same way, what is Huawei's sales volume and share chart? Revenue and net profit, right?
Therefore, I think that the values of revenue and net profit are enough to show the size of the corresponding company to a certain extent. Through the comparison of Huawei's official financial report and Apple's financial report, who has the larger volume and whether Huawei has surpassed Apple has long been obvious! So why do some people think that if Huawei is not targeted, it must be able to surpass Apple? Here is a quote: "If there is 10% profit, it is guaranteed to be used everywhere; if there is 20% profit, it is active; with 50% profit, it is desperate; for 100% profit, it dares to trample on all human laws; with 300% profit, it dares to commit any crime, even the danger of hanging its head." The source of this sentence everyone searches for themselves, I summarized him as four words of businessman pursuit of profit, so let's look around, all day left one analysis, right one point of view who is who? Basically, they are all so-called self-media "big coffee", right?
After the information about Huawei's targeting came out, almost overnight, a lot of "righteous and awe-inspiring" gentlemen emerged, and their heads were the head of the Road, bitterly advising others to support Huawei, do they really support Huawei? No! What they value is the heat and traffic brought by Huawei's two words, and these two things represent the economy! Therefore, Huawei's surpassing Apple is itself worth playing, and if you really support Huawei, you will not believe the dreams they weave through words or language! After introducing the background, let's return to the fact that Huawei surpassed Apple, did Huawei surpass Apple? Yu Chengdong, CEO of Huawei's consumer business, has also passed on such a view, but the so-called core of the so-called transcendence in his mouth is share and sales volume, and it has never been mentioned in terms of revenue, right? In addition, the product transcendence is only looking for a certain feature or a parameter on a certain hardware, right?
Is the transcendence in these places counted as transcendence? No, the Lamborghini's engine was put on the carriage, and the carriage could not run that speed. In fact, the parameters are greater than the comparison of 1 to 2 times, such a transcendence seems to lack a benchmark, can only say that the benevolent see the wise! Although this is a matter of benevolence and wisdom, there is a recent data that seems to have shaken this matter! Brand Finance, a British brand evaluation agency, released the "2022 Global Technology Brand Value 100" (TECHNOLOGY 100 2022) list, and Apple topped the list with a brand value of $355.08 billion (about 2.3 trillion yuan). According to the list, Huawei ranks seventh with 71.233 billion US dollars (about 460 billion yuan), and the number one Apple is about 5 times that of Huawei! You say, Huawei surpassed Apple? Even if it is not targeted, how long will it take Huawei to surpass Apple?
If revenue and net profit can't represent anything, then this brand value should be a bit of a doorway, right? What are the criteria for evaluating brand value? According to my relatively shallow knowledge reserve, the things that need to be evaluated for this brand value are brand longevity, brand name, brand recognition, product category, product quality, consumer attitude, brand continuity, purchase tendency, market performance, product service, brand loyalty, patent value, etc. In other words, this brand value assessment is the result of a comprehensive performance of the products you run, so the answer to Huawei's surpassing Apple should have a silhouette, even if it is not very clear, right? Therefore, knowing this, I think that Huawei is a god, and surpassing Apple is not a good thing! This is not aimed at Huawei, but to say that the current atmosphere is not satisfactory!
Internet economy, the advantage is the rapid development of the economic level, what are the disadvantages? Have you ever heard the big guys or the so-called bricklayers talk about these things? Yes, and very little, right? Why didn't anyone say that? As an ordinary person, don't dare to say or dare to ask! But I know in my heart that even the United States, which is packaged to the teeth, has suffered the loss of the Internet economy, which is recorded! In a speech at Stanford, Apple CEO Tim Cook described the Internet today! He said: "You don't have to take responsibility to get honor... Every eye turns into hate speech, fake news is poisoning us... In exchange for a false miracle with a drop of blood, too many people think that good intentions can justify harmful results. "Isn't that what's happening on our Internet right now?" At this point, is this "fig leaf" torn open by me Huawei's? I don't think I need to prove it anymore, right?