According to the news from foreign media, as Huawei continues to obtain 5G commercial orders from Brazil, Turkey and other regions, the United Kingdom cannot sit still, officially stating that there is no so-called security problem for Huawei equipment, and the plan to dismantle Huawei equipment will be postponed for 6 months.
It should be known that the United Kingdom was the first country to respond to the dismantling of Huawei equipment, and originally planned to dismantle all Huawei equipment, including 5G, within 7 years, and at least reduce the proportion of Huawei 5G and other equipment to 35% by January 2023.
But now, Britain's attitude has changed, directly saying that it will postpone the demolition plan for 6 months.
What does this mean? Is this a change of heart for Huawei?
Foreign media: Can't stop
Interestingly, when the above news spread, some foreign media made an analysis of it, believing that this time it was really unstoppable, and Huawei 5G has become the most preferred choice in most countries.
Why? There are three reasons for this.
First: the progress of dismantling equipment is not good. Lao Mei has been smearing Huawei equipment on the grounds of "security backdoor" and instigating other countries to completely dismantle Huawei equipment, including preparing to give $1.9 billion to subsidize domestic operators to dismantle Huawei and ZTE equipment.
But the progress has not been satisfactory, the so-called $1.9 billion compensation has not arrived, until now, the local rural operator's Huawei equipment has not been completely dismantled.
Second: changes in export rules. In addition to Huawei and ZTE, who else can help other countries with 5G construction? Only Nokia and Ericsson.
However, in the Russian-Ukrainian conflict, everyone has seen that the so-called "technology without borders" is completely a joke, and Nokia and Ericsson have successively announced the cut off of supply to Russia.
Let me ask, if the United Kingdom really adopts Nokia and Ericsson equipment, then will it not be slaughtered in the field of communications?
Third: Huawei's own efforts. The data released by market research institutes has become clear, it is not advisable to suppress Huawei, and even now, Huawei is still sitting on the throne of the world's largest communication equipment manufacturer.
This means that Huawei has won most of the global 5G market, and it is no longer meaningful to suppress it. What's more, Huawei still has the most 5G technology patents in the world, and even if they do not use Huawei's 5G equipment, they still have to pay 5G patent fees to Huawei.
So in summary, Huawei has market advantages, technical advantages, and product cost advantages, so why not use Huawei?
Perhaps when the "rogue" gets used to it, when the product and technology are not comparable, they want to directly "play rogue", label your product as a "safety hazard", and then dismantle your product, then everyone can only use the equipment he specified?
But as everyone knows, the times have changed, good products are not short of customers, and not all customers are "soft bones"!
All this is also as Huawei founder Ren Zhengfei said before: "The best 5G in the world is Huawei, not buying them is their stupidity, not using Huawei equipment is their loss!" ”