Many historical figures in China are full of great controversy, and their evaluations have been polarized, and some historical figures have been excessively exalted and touted through opera, wild history, novels, the likes and dislikes of rulers, folk beliefs, myths and legends, such as Guan Yu, who was gradually promoted and deified from a military general in the late Eastern Han Dynasty to a loyal incarnation of the rulers to educate the people, Guan Sheng the Great, the protector of Buddhism, the folk god of martial wealth, and the "martial saint" in Chinese's heart, corresponding to the "Wen sheng" Confucius At the same time, Cao Cao became a thief and a generation of adulterers, but in modern times, some people say that Cao Cao should not be "white-faced" and should be overturned.
The following historical figures are also very controversial, do you think they need to be overturned?
Figure 1: Qin Shi Huang, the emperor who unified China through the ages, was also a typical tyrant in feudal rule.
Figure 2: Liu Chan, the happy Ah Dou, but some people say that he is a great wisdom and foolishness.
Figure 3: Cao Cao, a chaotic tyrant who unified the north, a generation of literary heroes.
Figure 4: Qin Ju killed Yue Fei's traitors on the charge of "false accusations" and tried to block the Northern Expedition; but some people said that he had "suffered" for Emperor Gaozong of Song
Figure 5: Li Hongzhang, a foreign minister, a signatory of a series of unequal treaties, called himself the "Great Qing Framer".
Figure 6, Yuan Shikai, some people say that he is a "one-man thief" and "a thief who steals the country" and some people think that he contributed to China's modernization and was "the first among the reformers".
* Only shallow learning, there are absurdities please correct.
