Natural persons need to know the source and use of access to more than 50,000, purely increasing unnecessary trouble? From the perspective of modern social life, 50,000 yuan is not a very large amount, if you save 50,000 yuan

Natural persons need to know the source and use of access to more than 50,000, purely increasing unnecessary trouble?

From the perspective of modern social life, 50,000 yuan is not a very large amount, if you save 50,000 yuan, you must also ask how to save it, take 50,000 yuan and ask what it is used to give it, only to cause inconvenience to many people.

The renminbi is a bearer currency, and in principle, it should be able to be deposited and withdrawn as it pleases, and no additional conditions can be added. In the past, the so-called large appointments were only to facilitate the cash arrangements of the bank branches themselves, and the cashiers were actually very concessional. Now that the access and withdrawal has additional uses and sources of funds, does it mean that my money is in the bank, and if I can't say the purpose that convinces the teller, I won't withdraw it?

If there is a clear clue to the problem of funds, the current funds can be restricted or even frozen, but the one-size-fits-all measures will only increase the inconvenience to the people, and also increase the work content of grass-roots bank outlets, which is really inappropriate.