Usually, when a person conquers others, there are three levels: the first layer is the conquest by force, the second level is the conquest of interests, and the third level is by thinking

Conquered by force, virtue is not worthy, and there will be great disasters

Usually, there are three levels when a person conquers others:

The first layer is the conquest by force, the second layer is the conquest of interests, and the third layer is the conquest of thought.

Today, we talk about those who are conquered by force, and these people seem to be strong and arrogant on the surface, but in fact they are the most cowardly and incompetent people.

The more a person shows something, the more he emphasizes something, the more he lacks something.

Is a person who is superficially arrogant really confident? Absolutely not, his arrogance must be accompanied by a strong inner inferiority, because he lacks self-confidence, so he has to pretend to be very confident, and his arrogance is a lack of recognition from others in the inner world.

Similarly, a person who is grumpy often beats people up because he is really strong?

Definitely not.

Do you think about the circumstances under which you will be angry and want to use force to solve the problem?

Is it when you are helpless in the face of the person or things in front of you, is it when you cannot cope with the situation in front of you, is it when you feel powerless to do anything?

When you can't solve the problem and feel powerless, you will be angry and you will use violence to solve it, which is the essence of military conquest.

It is cowardice, it is incompetence, it is inferiority, it is fear.

What are the consequences of such an act?

For example:

What would happen if a person hit you because of a verbal altercation with you, but the current situation does not allow you to return? Is it possible for you to be soft on the surface, but what you must be thinking in your heart is "I will definitely find an opportunity to kill you in the future, and even dare to bully me!" ”

Similarly, if a person does not become the "head of a country" by waging war by force, through normal channels, but by waging war by force, think about how long he can sit in this position?

Will the ministers below truly believe him? No, it won't. Because he is using force to impose sanctions, it is a kind of plunder, and it is most likely that he is not worthy of the position.

"If virtue is not worthy of the throne, there will be disasters", and soon he will pay the price and be punished.

The essence of military conquest is to break through the rules, the world has a set of operating mechanisms, and people who rely on force to conquer want to "go through the back door", because they know that they cannot stand on the same platform as others to compete fairly, and can only be forced to "succeed" in this way, but they do not consider that they have not been able to get it, which only means that cognitive ability is not in place.

It's like "plucking seedlings to fuel growth", and the gains from force are bound to be fleeting.

For if virtue is not worthy, there will be calamities. #认知 #