laitimes

Vietnam began to grab the right to speak for the Spring Festival: An article on vietnam's official website at the beginning of the year mentioned that "the Spring Festival originated in Vietnam" is not a spring festival, it is a grab to speak. What may be unclear to many people is that the text

author:After the rain, the sun is sunny

Vietnam begins to grab the right to speak about the Spring Festival: an article on Vietnam's official website mentioned that "the Spring Festival originated in Vietnam"

That's not robbing the Spring Festival, that's grabbing the right to speak.

What may not be clear to many people is that ownership within the cultural realm is an absolutely exclusive one.

The battle is for a final interpretation.

Let's not talk about anything else, just take this dispute over Li Bai's hometown, because CCTV resumed broadcasting Hubei Anlu propaganda film with the mention of "Li Bai's hometown", Sichuan Jiangyou was not happy.

Sichuan Jiangyou said that it would once again attack the dispute over "Li Bai's hometown", saying that it would not receive a satisfactory answer and would sue Hubei Anlu and the State Administration for Industry and Commerce.

What do you talk about and harmony?

When it comes to the struggle for core interests, people will not make the slightest concession at all, and what they want is the ultimate ownership of Li Bai's hometown.

Why did Yongle have to adhere to the banner of "Hongwu" for everything he did with the throne of Jianwen, and why did Yongzheng insist on defending his orthodoxy when he took the throne?

Without him, for the sake of a justifiable name.

You are the origin of culture, you have the right to explain culture, we have the Spring Festival, people have followed, to a small extent this is the relationship between large and small sects, to a large extent this is the dispute of cultural leaders.

You really can care less about this stuff, but the people have to care.

Your Dragon Boat Festival, which was applied for by South Korea, is equal to people's festivals in international law, and no matter how you say that this is your own, people respond with one sentence:

What about the evidence?

Let's not pull anything about this thing, this thing is a bit useful for debate, really put on the public who really cares about this thing?

People just recognize "who it is."

You say it's your own, and you don't recognize it yourself, so what else are you fixing with people?

The Spring Festival is also a truth.

We say that the Spring Festival is our own, we have the custom of setting off firecrackers and sticking to the Spring Festival, and we have the final right to explain.

But if Vietnam wins, people will have the final right to explain, people can say whatever they want, even if people say that they want to eat turkey during the Spring Festival, you can't do it.

The cultural sphere wins the final right of interpretation.

This is followed by interests.

Simply put, paste the Spring League to drive the industry, set off firecrackers to drive the industry, eat turkey is also the industry, this is the industry.

Deeper, cultural identity, peaceful evolution, and line struggles are the invasion and assimilation of ideas.

Read on