Recently, a netizen in Wuhan, Hubei Province, said that his child broke a cultural relic in the museum when he participated in the off-campus training winter camp and was asked to compensate 1.3 million yuan.
The parent said that the child was 12 years old and participated in a 5-day off-campus composition training class during the winter vacation, during which an accident occurred when the teacher of the training institution took the child to visit the museum. He spent 1,000 yuan to give his children a winter vacation camp, and the result was a tragic result of asking for 1.3 million yuan in compensation, he said: "This is the rhythm of bankruptcy."
In the subsequent video, he posted the child's outstanding Young Pioneer Medal and said, "Don't be afraid, be brave to face, and have the courage to bear." However, for how to compensate, he still hopes that other netizens can support it. He believes that paying to hand over the child to the training institution to participate in the activity, the child is only 12 years old, the custody is temporarily transferred to the teacher, and the training institution should bear a higher compensation ratio.
Surveillance video shows the half-human-tall terracotta figurine figure in a corner, with many students active nearby. When a student passed the clay figurines, his body accidentally touched the hands of the figurines, and as a result, the figurines broke into two pieces from the middle part and fell to the ground and were damaged.
The museum responded: Not 1.3 million
The reporter then interviewed the staff of the museum, who said that the damaged exhibits were bought from Japan 9 years ago, when more than 200,000 yuan was spent, and the museum never said that the exhibits were worth 1.3 million yuan, and it was impossible to claim compensation in this way.
In the early morning of January 26, the representative of the museum side @ Piece Jiang Zhou_ posted a response on Weibo: This town tomb figurine is not 1.3 million, the police party is not a museum, the museum has never blackmailed research institutions and blackmailed parents of children, and is still in the negotiation stage.
The blogger posted chats with parents, which showed that parents had recorded 1.3 million requests for exhibits, but the source of the sound was not the museum.
The museum staff said that the museum has been holding public welfare exhibitions for everyone to visit for free. On the day of the incident, the training institution involved told the museum that it brought the children to visit for the purpose of study. The staff admitted: "This exhibit has always been placed like this before, without a glass cover or guardrail. We do have a responsibility for this to happen, and we recognize that we didn't take good care of our children when they brought it up. ”
But in Weibo, @Kata Jiang Zhou_ also questioned the teacher who led the team, did the teacher take the children into the museum have done any preparatory work? After entering the museum, why did the teacher keep looking at the mobile phone?
The reporter contacted the training institution involved, and the staff said that the matter is currently being mediated, and the value of the exhibits and the amount of compensation are not clear. The staff said: "Regarding the value of the exhibits and the money transferred by the parents, the teacher may be in a hurry to say it casually, and I need to know more about the specific situation." ”
Although the compensation for breaking the exhibits is not the 1.3 million yuan spread on the Internet, the incident still aroused the attention of netizens. The museum revealed on January 26 that at present, the relevant departments have intervened in mediation, the child is well protected, and the amount of compensation is within the acceptable range of everyone.
For the matter
Many netizens questioned
Expensive exhibits are just casually placed in the corner?
expert:
"Naked" exhibitions are OK, but they must be protected
"This matter should be viewed from two aspects, one is the audience's visit literacy, not necessarily cultural relics with historical value, even if it is a contemporary work of art, even cultural creation is placed there, visitors should pay attention to improve their own visiting literacy." Gao Menghe, a professor in the Department of Cultural Relics and Museology of Fudan University, told reporters that on the other hand, when the museum displays exhibitions, it should also pay attention to the safety of cultural relics, modern and contemporary art, and cultural and creative works. Gao Menghe said that many foreign museums have a tradition of "naked" exhibitions, and China has been trying, but the key needs to protect the items on display, "We use ropes, transparent fishing lines, etc., without affecting the exhibition, we can let the exhibits get close to the audience." ”
"When cultural relics are exhibited in the museum, there is no protective measures such as glass covers, and it is reasonable to only have the 'no touch' method." The Cultural Relics Hospital of the Great V@ for the Protection of Cultural Relics also told reporters that many museums at home and abroad have a large number of exposed cultural relics, and many of them do not even have "no touch", which is related to the overall quality of visitors. "Of course, museums also have the obligation to protect exhibits and audiences, and if exhibits fall down and injure the audience, museums also have safety hazards." The other party also said that according to the relevant domestic regulations, there is no requirement that the cultural relics exhibited in the museum must be equipped with a glass protective cover, etc., and many museums hope that there is no glass cover, so that the audience can have a more intuitive understanding of the cultural relics, "but many museums are later forced to add glass covers." ”
How should the child compensate for the situation in this incident where the child is suspected of encountering cultural relics and causing the cultural relics to be broken? @Heritage Hospital believes that "it is definitely the parties and guardians who bear the main responsibility." As for how to compensate, it is necessary for both parties to negotiate or legal judgment. ”
Sources| Shanghai News Broadcasting, Beijing Youth Daily, China News Weekly, Red Star News
Editor| Han Yuting, Zhu Chanchan, Ding Zhaoru
Have your "likes" "watching"
The Dharma Emperor will work harder