The question of who is the greatest athlete in the world men's tennis world has been debated endlessly, and although Djokovic has risen strongly in recent years, not only has he equaled Federer and Nadal in the total number of Grand Slams, but also in the Masters and the number of world first weeks, he is still unable to replace Federer and Nadal in the eyes of some experts.
Luke Jensen, a 55-year-old American tennis star, pointedly pointed out: "Federer is the greatest tennis player, he is equivalent to James Bond in tennis, and Djokovic is not." Djokovic had a chance to be that, but he didn't win in last year's US Open final, which was unlucky. It is understood that Jensen won the 1993 French Open men's doubles championship, and in 1996 the Australian Open and the French Open won the mixed doubles runner-up, his vision is broad, the rich experience, is most practitioners can not match.
In addition, tennis columnist Simon also expressed the same view in his latest article: "Although Djokovic has done a perfect job in terms of data, he still has a significant gap in terms of world popularity than Federer Nadal. ”
In fact, the views of the above two experts also basically represent the mainstream view of the tennis world, in competitive sports, everything is a preconceived rule, the latecomer wants to surpass the former, often need to do far beyond the former's achievements to be possible, otherwise it is still difficult to change people's subjective impressions. To be sure, Deyo's overall achievements are indeed not inferior to Federer and Nadal, but his position in the audience is difficult to surpass the first two, and perhaps only if he wins 5 Grand Slams than Fenardo, he may be the greatest in history.