What two problems did Liu Bang do? In the first question, the Chu and Han sides confronted each other in Xingyang, and Xiang Yu put on a cauldron in front of the battle, boiled water, and got Liu Bang's old father and wife to the front of the battle, threatening Liu Bang and saying, You hurry up and surrender, or I will cook your father. Liu Bang said, you cook, you and I once called the king of Chuhuai a vassal, about brothers, my father is your father, you have to cook your father, cooked to give me a cup of meat soup. In this regard, many experts accused Liu Bang of being a hooligan, a lack of affection, no humanity, and only caring about taking the country and mountains by himself, regardless of his father's life. This is equivalent to saying that Xiang Yu gave Liu Bang a problem, and Liu Bang's response was zero points in the eyes of experts. So why do I give a 90? Here's why:
(1) In the face of Xiang Yu's threat, Liu Bang did not say so, what did he say? Do you have to say, "Don't do it, don't cook my father, I'll surrender immediately." Can he say that? He said this, and did so, how to face hundreds of thousands of soldiers? It is equivalent to ruining the Great Han Dynasty and the hope that the people can live a better life.
(2) In the face of Xiang Yu's threat, Liu Bang replied to Xiang Yu, "My father is your father, you want to cook your father, please share my share of the soup" is a very clever and wise answer, which is a strange trick that forces Xiang Yu to a moral dead end. Anyway, my father is your father, if you want to kill my father, it is equivalent to killing your father. Liu Bang said this, can Xiang Yu still kill Liu Bang's father? Killing Liu Bang's father is equivalent to killing his own father. ——This is actually Liu Bang using "gossip" and "tuina" to save his father. General experts do not have such a high level, can not understand, can not understand.
(3) Ten thousand steps back to say that in the face of Xiang Yu's threat, Liu Bang did not back down, and finally Xiang Yu really killed Liu Bang's father, which does not mean that Liu Bang is inhuman, ruthless and unjust, but can only say that Xiang Yu is cruel. Because, before the two armies were in front, they should have relied on real guns and real knives to speak with strength, and you got an old man of eighty or ninety years old to come to the front of the front and use the method of threatening to cook him and blackmail the other side into surrendering. Isn't that hooliganism?
During the Liberation War, the Nationalist side detained many Communists in Chongqing and threatened the Communists not to go south, otherwise they would kill those imprisoned Communists. As a result, the communist side did not listen to the threat of the state side, went directly south, liberated the whole country, and finally the state side killed the detained communists.
In a word, before the two armies, Xiang Yu threatened to kill Liu Bang's father, and Liu Bang's response could definitely score more than 90 points, not zero points.
The second question, the Battle of Pengcheng in Chu and Han, Liu Bang was defeated by Xiang Yu and fled east and west. One day, Liu Bang was running southwest in a carriage driven by Emperor Tenggong Xiahou, and on the way he met a pair of his sons and daughters, so he took his children and fled with them. After running for a while, I didn't want to, and out of nowhere, I killed a puma and chased after him from behind, which was clearly the banner of the Chu army. Seeing that the more they chased closer and closer, and the horse that pulled Liu Bang to escape because he ran for a long time, probably tired, running slower and slower, seeing that the distance was only one or two kilometers away, suddenly Liu Bang's car was tripped by something, Liu Bang asked a pair of children to get out of the car, and pulled them with their feet. The children got out of the car, but the servant Teng Gongxia Hounian did not agree, and had to let the two children get back on the car. In the end, the two children got back on the bus, and several people were not caught by the Chu army and successfully escaped. For this matter, it can be seen as a problem given to Liu Bang by Chu Jun and his children, and Liu Bang's answer is: pull his children out of the car and run by themselves. In this regard, some experts represented by Mr. Wang Liqun naturally gave zero points, on the grounds that at the critical moment, leaving their children behind and only caring about their own lives, they still have no humanity. And my answer to Liu Bang still gives more than 90 points.
Because under the circumstances at that time, Liu Bang let a pair of sons and daughters get off the car, which was a wise choice: (1) the enemy chased the faster, the closer the chase; (2) the driving horse was tired, the slower it ran; (3) there were too many people in the car, and the slower it ran. If everyone sat in the car and did not get out of the car, they would definitely be chased by the enemy and everyone would be taken prisoner. Compared with some people getting off the bus and making some people run away without being prisoners, the latter approach is of course a good choice. Is it a good result to have family affection and human feelings, and it is necessary for everyone to sit in the car together and be arrested together?
Speaking of this, some people may say that some people get off the bus, why doesn't Liu Bang get off the bus, but a pair of children have to get off the bus? I would say that if Liu Bang got out of the car, went into the woods or into the crop fields, and successfully escaped, and the car carrying a pair of children was chased by the Chu army and captured the people in the car, then some people would say that Liu Bang was really bad as a man, took a pair of children as bait, and ran into the woods by himself, so that a pair of children were caught! In short, those who can't look at Liu Bang, who are looking for Liu Bang's faults, and what Liu Bang does are all wrong.
In fact, Liu Bang's sons and daughters did not get out of the car, the four of them ran in the car together, and finally they were really caught up by the Chu army. The man who caught up with them was named Ding Gong, a general of the Chu army. It was only because Liu Bang was clever and kind that Ding Gong let them go. From this point of view, Xiahou Infant did not let Liu Bang's two children get off the car, and the result was that everyone was caught up by the Chu army, and the reason why they were not captured by the Chu army in the end was completely an accident. Therefore, in the process of escape, in the face of special circumstances, Liu Bang let the two children get off the bus, which was a completely wise move, and there was no such thing as Liu Bang disregarding family affection and greed for life. Therefore, I give Liu Bang this answer 90 points.
In addition, for the record of Liu Bang escaping and kicking his children off the car, the ancients had a man named Weng Xiaolian who was very suspicious, he said: "Looking at Xiang Yu and Gao Zu Erji, then this is Shi Gong's suppression of Yang's words, not in fact." There is no way to save children in a hurry, and there is no way to abandon them. It is not a great blessing to be man-made, and it is inhuman to be angry with others and repeatedly behead them. The Qi Dongye language means that Gao Zu is thinner than father and son, and I am afraid that it is not complete. ”