At this year's 2021 Sequoia Digital Technology Global Leaders Summit, BYD President Wang Chuanfu said: The performance of new energy vehicles in all aspects comprehensively exceeds that of fuel vehicles. This sentence is just right for everyone to reassure them. In fact, similar words have long been a consensus in the industry, but ordinary consumers are still in the dark. There are reasons why consumers can't realize it, on the other hand, it is also related to the deliberate misleading and smearing of new energy vehicles by some traditional fuel vehicle companies.
Regarding new energy, how big is the misunderstanding of ordinary consumers?
1, think that new energy is an electric vehicle, is that not a toy? More than an electric bicycle is called new energy?
Rebuttal: In your eyes, is the rocket a large monkey?
2, electric vehicles, that is a big toy for rich people. Aren't bumper cars in amusement parks all electric? When I was a child, I used to ride the trolleybus, the kind that dragged the big braids, and now the tram is not to cut the braids?
Rebuttal: Typical only seen pigs run, never eaten pork, you have not eaten do not know how fragrant it is.
3, new energy vehicles, fuel saving does not save money! A battery is tens of thousands, when changing the battery, how much fuel money to save must be put in!
Rebuttal: You can buy a battery lifetime product, change the battery without spending a penny.
4, really hybrid, not plugged in! You have to refuel, you have to recharge...
Rebuttal: True eunuch, not good. You want to plug, do you have that feature? Plug-in hybrid is more external charging function than HEV (Japanese dual engine), which can be run as a pure tram, and no external charging is the same as HEV. Equivalent to an enhanced version.
5, I have no limit number, and I don't need a green card, that's what big cities can't buy.
Rebuttal: First, no limit now does not mean that there will be no limit in the future, and second, even if there is no new energy related policy, the same price point is far better than fuel.
6, plug-in hybrid, two sets of power, the failure rate is certainly high.
Rebuttal: First, the motor has no wear, does not accumulate carbon, does not require maintenance, the probability of damage is extremely low, the battery has attenuation, but it can be guaranteed for life. In fact, many brands of three-electric systems are guaranteed for life. Second, you are also more complex than single-celled organisms, who is more advanced?
7, plug-in hybrid, said that the tram can not run far, said that the oil car also carries this large battery.
Rebuttal: Pure electricity 80Km, enough for the vast majority of people to use in the city commuting, do not go out of the door without oil. Last year, the epidemic did not go out, I really used a tank of oil for half a year, and the oil added in order to wash the car before the New Year, until the children went out to drive in the summer vacation, they added the second time. It is used as a fuel vehicle, because it avoids the waste of fuel consumption at the start and idling, even if it is not charged, it is more fuel-efficient than the fuel vehicle. Not to mention the current DM-i, plug-in hybrid combines the advantages of pure electricity and fuel, without their shortcomings.
8, battery life anxiety! There is no endurance anxiety for the oil car!
Rebuttal: Oil trucks also have endurance anxiety, no gas station you try? Drive to no man's land to try it? What really doesn't have endurance anxiety is the carriage, which is full of grass and can be replenished at any time. Trams now run long distances and there are indeed shortcomings, but new energy is not just trams, plug-in hybrids, can refuel and recharge, long-distance and oil vehicles the same. Even to the point where there is no gas station, as long as you have 220V home electricity, it will not lie down.
These remarks are basically seen in my comment area, in fact, before that, I really did not know that everyone's awareness of new energy can be so low. Why is that? Let's think about it.
Ordinary consumers who do not understand new energy vehicles themselves, how do they know the problem of battery attenuation? And how to know the price of the battery, a battery pack tens of thousands? When Toyota and Honda push hybrids in China, why doesn't anyone mention the problem of battery attenuation? Think about it? The double engine Corolla also has a battery, the battery will also decay, and the replacement of a battery is indeed more than 20,000, and the price is clearly marked. At that time, why didn't anyone say that the Japanese HEV hybrid had this problem?
Battery attenuation does exist, and the cost of replacing the battery is really high. However, BYD promised a lifetime warranty of batteries as early as 2015 (perhaps earlier), and as the first generation of Tang car owners, at least no less than 20 people around me have changed batteries, and they are free to change, and not a penny is spent. How many people know about the lifetime warranty of the battery cell?
Even if someone knows, it will be followed by a sentence: natural decay is not guaranteed, and then you will cry - what am I crying? Just after saying that, no less than 20 people around me have changed.
In addition, ponder this sentence: really hybrid, not plugged in. At that time, it seemed to be 15 or 16 years, and there were basically two kinds of hybrids on the market, Tang and Qin's plug-in hybrids, and Toyota dual engines that could not be charged, mainly Corolla and Leiling. The misleading effect of this sentence on consumers is huge, and the subtext seems to be that plug-in hybrids are both fueled and charged, so that many people now do not know that plug-in hybrids can be oiled, charged while walking, and all aspects are stronger than HEV hybrids. In fact, look at the price of Corolla Dual Engine and Corolla Dual Engine E+ to know the gap in technology and cost. The Corolla dual engine guidance price is 135,800, and the dual engine E+ 207,800.
The state vigorously promotes new energy vehicles, which is also to give subsidies, and it is also exempt from purchase tax on the green card. So who is saying bad things about new energy vehicles? Think about it and don't be led by the nose.
The inside story and current situation of new energy:
Let's talk about something you didn't know.
In 2015, Tang Generation was listed, 2.0T engine, zero hundred acceleration of 4.9 seconds, full-time electric four-wheel drive, ministry of industry and information technology fuel consumption of 2L, the key is that this car sells more than 200,000! Imagine, if you are a certain field, a certain crowd, a certain chi of the top level, what do you think?
These multinational car companies, large groups, will they not have a market information department? New listing of such a car, their top management will not know? BYD Tang's information was sent to the president's office, did the gang have to scold the street?
You know, at that time, cars that could achieve zero hundred acceleration of 4.9 seconds had V6, or even V8 engines, and the price was not less than 1 million! The most important object to measure the value of the car is the power, and now a 4.9-second car sells for 200,000, how do you let us play with traditional car companies? ——I said the major car companies are trembling, do you believe it?
I didn't see these high-risers lose their hair and couldn't sleep, but as you can imagine. Even if you are selling buns, you have a dollar a vegetarian, two dollars a meat, from your grandfather's generation to sell, sold to now, safe and stable money for decades, diagonally opposite suddenly appeared a, a meatball big meat bun a dollar 6, just ask you not to panic! This is common sense.
This matter is not my speculation, in 2018, Tang Second Generation went public, the then Volkswagen president ran to Shanghai for the first time to test drive, one is the CEO of Volkswagen Group, called Matthias Muller, the co-pilot is called Heizmann, is the president of the Asia-Pacific region. These two brothers are the two highest-ranking figures in the Volkswagen Group, to test drive BYD, and speeding, you say they panicked?
In addition, the customs clearance data on October 8 of that year showed that a famous Japanese car company imported six BYD Tang from China, and guess what they bought back?
In 2015, only BYD in the world is doing plug-in hybrids, and now, you look at the car companies that are serious about building cars, who don't have plug-in hybrid models? Not to mention the BBA, Bentley Porsche also has a plug- and a mix. Note, from the first Tang listing, to now only 6 years, how big has the change been in 6 years? What happens in the next 6 years? That's exactly one of your car cycles.
You dare not buy new energy vehicles, why do car companies dare to build? Is it really just for the so-called new energy credits? No, it's because they don't dare not build! If you don't build it, you will be eliminated by the times! Therefore, the reality is that those traditional car companies are fooling you not to buy new energy, while seizing the time to develop new energy transformation. Think for yourself, isn't it?
Advantages and disadvantages of new energy vehicles:
New energy vehicles include four categories, pure electricity, plug-in hybrid, extender and hydrogen energy.
Hydrogen energy, or hydrogen fuel cells are false propositions – do you think that hydrogen is the ultimate energy source? It was brainwashed again. This thing will be pushed, because there are interests in it, not only in Japan, which holds most of the patented technology for hydrogen fuel cells, but also in some energy companies - you all use electricity and no one will refuel, they will have no money to make. If you push hydrogen energy, the gas station can also be changed to a hydrogen refueling station, understand?
Hydrogen fuel cells are essentially extended ranges, except that ordinary extenders (similar to the ideal One) use oil to generate electricity, which is only generated by hydrogen. Hydrogen is indeed clean energy, only produces water, no pollution - alcohol combustion only produces water! Alcohol can be made from straw, is a renewable resource, is safer than hydrogen, and costs less. Therefore, hydrogen energy is a false proposition, it is impossible to develop, even now in Japan, the first batch of hydrogen energy vehicles are also used as pure trams, why? How expensive is hydrogenation!
Range extender: Simply put, the engine generates electricity and uses electricity to drive the vehicle. It seems that there is one more energy conversion, which should be more wasteful, in fact, such a conversion can allow the engine to generate electricity in a constant high efficiency range, and the efficiency of the motor is more than 95%, and the loss is not much. Compared with fuel vehicles, there are idle speed, high rotation of the starting oil-rich state and other working conditions, or relatively fuel-efficient. In addition, the battery can generally be charged externally, which can achieve zero fuel consumption and pure electricity in the urban area.
The technology of range extension is not advanced, but compared with fuel vehicles, the advantages are still obvious. It also has disadvantages, although there is no mileage anxiety, but because the engine can not drive the vehicle directly, it can only pull up the number of motor revolutions at high speed. The efficiency of the motor will be significantly reduced in the case of high rotation, so when driving at high speed, the pure tram does not save power, and the range increase has no advantage in fuel consumption at high speed. However, range extensions are still an entry-level technical route to replace fuel vehicles. Perhaps, in the near future, coupled with the increase of the two-speed reducer, it will be the last straw for traditional fuel vehicle companies that lack technical reserves.
Plug-in hybrid: There are also many technical routes for plug-in hybrid subdivisions, but the overall highlights, first, like most of the extenders, can be charged externally, and pure electric driving can be realized in the urban area for a short distance. Second, in the long distance, the biggest difference between it and the range extender is that the engine can drive the vehicle directly. Range extender is not hybrid, it is called range extender electric vehicle, because oil and electricity are clearly distinguished, which is also the biggest difference between the two.
Plug-in mixing is significantly higher than the extender technology, such as BYD's DM-i, the range extender is only one of the modes, in addition, it can also use the engine direct drive, can make the motor and the engine together to provide power output, the engine drive at the same time to drive the engine to charge the battery... The extended range is just one of them. The DHT of the Great Wall, Geely and Chery is also a similar structure.
Another route is DM-p, which is a strong mix. The main difference between the two is the presence or absence of a gearbox. For example, BYD's Tang and Han DM, even if the battery is removed, the vehicle can still be driven as a pure fuel vehicle, and dm-i and other structures need a motor to change speed, and if the motor or battery has a problem, it will lose power.
Plug-in hybrid compared to the same price of fuel vehicles, there is no disadvantage! No cons! No cons! Why does BYD DM-i dare to shout the slogan of subverting fuel vehicles? Because people have made DM-i the price of fuel vehicles, taking Qin PLUS DM-i as an example, zero hundred acceleration of 7.9 seconds, no charging fuel consumption of 3.8L, charging zero fuel consumption, calculating the cost of household electricity car one kilometer and a few cents! Most of the pure electric driving, even if the engine is started, it is almost impossible to feel. The power is smooth, the ride is quiet, and the fuel car is out of reach!
Pure electricity is easier to understand, that is, motor driven, battery powered. Within the mileage, everything is easy to say, even if it is a hundred thousand pure trams, there are 500,000 smooth and quiet. However, its shortcomings are also obvious, it is difficult to replenish energy, and there is a problem of endurance anxiety.
note! We should not only see the shortcomings of new energy, but turn a blind eye to the shortcomings of traditional fuel vehicles! I listed the shortcomings of several fuel vehicles, and if you compare them, you will know why I recommend new energy.
1, the cost of the car is high: the car 100 km 8 oil, do not block the car, SUV 100 km 10 oil is normal, congestion road conditions twelve or three can not stop. 7 yuan a liter of oil, 100 kilometers less than 60 yuan. Compared with DM-i, charging is a bully, and the cost of a car for a few dollars for a hundred kilometers is cheaper than taking a bus. Let's say no charging, with oil, sedan 3.8L, SUV 4.4L, save more than half of it, right?
2, power difference: at least the same price point power difference. 100,000 you buy a 1.5L self-priming, ten seconds are it. Qin PLUS DM-i zero hundred 7.9 seconds. There are also domestic fuel "small steel cannons", shadow leopard, Yixuan MAX, MG 5, MG 6, at a price of 100,000 can enter 8 seconds is really rare. To the 200,000 level, the fuel car braced 2.0T, Tiggo 8 Kunpeng version, F7X, 6.6 seconds is the fastest, the car has Lynk & Co 03 + high-power version, 5.9 seconds, but also manual mode. Han DM, easy 4.7 seconds, medium and large sedan, landing cheaper than 03+.
3, easy to accumulate carbon: fuel vehicle carbon deposition is difficult to avoid, in fact, there will be carbon deposition in the same hybrid, but because the engine can work in the economic efficiency range for a long time, it is much better than the bad working conditions such as starting and idling of fuel vehicles. Also because there is a pure electric mode to share the mileage, the maintenance interval is also longer.
4, loud noise: you have an engine there, NVH is good, there will be sound. Motors, on the other hand, have natural advantages. Of course, the motor has a subtle current sound, some people will not be able to stand, this varies from person to person.
5, not environmental protection: this is needless to say, otherwise the state will not vigorously promote new energy and limit emissions. Of course, some people will say that electricity is not environmentally friendly, thermal power generation or something. This is also brainwashed by Akio Toyoda, do you think hydrogen production does not use electricity? Thermal power generation can at least be centralized treatment, and how to treat one person and one exhaust pipe on the road? And most of the tram charging is at night, which can help the grid cut peaks and fill valleys.
6, short life: not the life of the car, but the life of the use, the emission policy is increasingly stringent, after the country six is the country seven, the country eight, the vehicle is not mandatory scrap, but the emission policy can limit you from letting go on the road. This situation does not exist in the new energy green card.
7, the power response is slow: the fuel vehicle is smooth, you go down the throttle, it is also a mechanical transmission, and the response time is needed. The response of the motor is instantaneous. This is also the reason why many people are reluctant to drive a fuel car when they drive a tram.
What new energy to buy?
Four categories, hydrogen energy direct pass, I said, that's the pit, believe it or not. Pure electric, plug-in hybrid and extender can be selected.
Range extenders are relatively backward technologies, but backwardness is also stronger than fuel vehicles. Technology is fine, the key is that the use of backward technology of the car company - its technical reserves and strength can not grab much, so I am not too recommended. Now the range extender has the ideal ONE and The Landu FREE, both of which I recommend the Lando more, because the battery is guaranteed for life, and it is not a three-cylinder engine.
Pure electricity limited use scenario, if you do not have long-distance demand, more than 300 kilometers on the plane high-speed rail, then pure electricity can be bought. For example, commuting to work, the pure tram of tens of thousands of yuan is far stronger than the small micro fuel vehicle.
If you have a car at home and want to go out and drive yourself, it is recommended not to choose to charge.
For most families, plugging in is the best option. Some would argue that interming is a transitional technique – rebutting in advance, what is the transition technique between what and what? Is it the transition from fuel vehicles to pure electricity? So what is the technology of fuel? Obsolete technology! What about buying pure electricity? The kind of pure electricity to be transitioned to is not a concept with the current pure electricity, right? Pure electricity is an immature technology. So, it's a transition period, and the transition technology is the best fit for you.
BYD's DM-i, the cheaper the higher the cost performance, can be bought. Tang and Han DM is now 3.0, you can buy it, but if you are not in a hurry, it is still recommended to wait for the 4.0 DM-p. The Great Wall lemon DHT plug mix also came out, first Macchiato PHEV, Mocha new energy was also pre-sold, the price is slightly higher than THE BYD DM-i, but the same can be bought. Far more than the same price of fuel vehicles. For example, Geely Thunder Divine Intelligence Dyt Pro, Chery Kunpeng DHT, Changan IDD, released are worth paying attention to a wave. Definitely stronger than fuel vehicles, it depends on the price.
Final note: whether it is plugged in, extended or pure electricity, you must buy a battery for life! Unless you're rich enough to treat your car like a toy.