About Lenovo, it has developed into a big debate.
First of all, I declare that this content is particularly reluctant to write, because I am not willing to argue with self-media people, and we kill each other for an association, which is not worth it.
However, from last night to this morning, after watching the video of the Art Research Association commenting on Sima Nan, and watching the video of Teacher Gu Wanli commenting on the Art Research Conference, it was really difficult to be at peace, and I shared and discussed it with you.
First put a picture of Lenovo, indicating that this matter is related to Lenovo, because of Lenovo, sent to the Network.
Among the many netizens who evaluated Lenovo, the latest one called the Art Research Association was indeed out of the sky.
In the first few videos of the American Research Institute, I still think this guy is very level, the speech is progressive, the logic is rigorous, and it sounds very reasonable. Teacher Gu Wanli of Shandong University of Technology also commented that this is the most level of washing the floor for Lenovo that he has ever seen. So, I followed the account, and I liked rigorous and in-depth logical speculation, even ignoring his position.
However, I have recently found that I was so wrong that if I did not take the wrong position, the logic would collapse violently, and all the speculations that were wrong in the position would eventually go down the path of personal attack, just like 270. Think about it, a person with a very logical thinking ability, talking and talking, finds that his logic is ridiculous, how much chagrin it must be, until he is ashamed and angry.
There are many issues in the video about the evaluation of Lenovo by the American Research Institute, and the author has also made great efforts, which is a responsible person, not as levelless as 270. Regarding the logic of those videos, it is recommended that you look at the video of Gu Wanli teacher, the level of university professors is really not covered, much stronger than our average person, the video of the Art Research Association in front of the university professors, just like no clothes, it is recommended that you look more.
So, what is the personal attack on Sima Nan that we are talking about today?
Regarding the incident of Lenovo, for us ordinary netizens, we comment on Lenovo, Liu Chuanzhi Yang Yuanqing or not, everyone is the deep responsibility of love, hoping to cure the disease and save people, rather than a stick to kill, no one hopes that Lenovo will fall. Everyone has principles and a bottom line, will not tear their faces, will not scold people, will not engage in personal attacks, but only discuss things and judge people. Of course, there are exceptions, such as some time ago called Xiang Mougang, who defended Lenovo with a white face, and later netizens pulled out that Lenovo had an interest in him, which can be understood, money is his bottom line.
However, the recent issues of the Council have somewhat personally attacked Sima Nan. Of course, the personal attacks of the American Research Institute are also very level, the logic is clear, and the layers are progressive, revealing Sima Nan and the team behind him and related "routines".
This is a bit of a direct tear to the bottom line, there is no bottom line and no principle. Even if the logic of what is said is criticized by Teacher Gu Wanli, it doesn't matter.
The American Research Institute also said in a video that he did not take a penny from Lenovo and had nothing to do with Lenovo. We believe this. However, on this statement, Teacher Gu Wanli also has a very sharp comment, probably saying that Chinese culture is really mysterious, "there is no silver here three hundred and two" how is so wonderful, the person who takes the money will not say that he took the money.
I really love Teacher Gu Wanli so much, I suggest you watch his videos more.
Some netizens are also studying the relationship between the Art Research Association and Lenovo, which is very interesting.
The American Research Association is really level, so netizens began to look for evidence. Some people say that this art research association does not know whether it has anything to do with the "Chinese Aesthetics Research Society" banned by the relevant departments, and some people say that it is a change of vest. There is no evidence in this matter, and I dare not say it indiscriminately.
The American Research Institute said that they did not take Lenovo's money, and we believed it. It is recommended that everyone watch their videos more, so that they can earn more money on the platform and make up for their hard work.
Above all, what do you think? Feel free to leave a message in the comments section. Welcome to favorite and forward, thank you.