When we express our views and opinions on the Internet, we must respect the existing facts and the authoritative determinations and conclusions that have been formed. Based on this, I have done today's issue of graphic content.
What is my point of view in the first place? Regarding the demolition of the thirty-nine buildings on Haihua Island, Sima Nan's entire analysis and questioning is either ignorance, or he has not looked at the ins and outs of the entire Haihua Island incident, or he has deliberately concealed major details. Today, we will reprint the authoritative department identification and relevant media news reports that have been released, and review the decision of the Danzhou Municipal Law Enforcement Bureau to dismantle this time limit, and a historical origin behind it.
Sea Flower Island
First of all, we know that the thirty-nine buildings to be demolished on Haihua Island are conclusive, and who made the conclusion of this matter, let's first throw out today's first authoritative news and views that have been published, that is, this is from the "China Discipline Inspection and Supervision Daily", which is the relevant news published by authoritative newspapers and periodicals, this headline is "The Thirty-nine Buildings of Haihua Island Were Ordered to Be Demolished, and the Zhongji Bao: Behind It is a Distorted View of Political Achievements." In this report, the views expressed are that Guo Zhaohui, deputy director of the Department of Social Civilization of the Central Party School, the teaching and research office of ecological civilization construction, and Mr. Zhou Rong, associate professor of the School of Architecture of Tsinghua University, these two should be authoritative figures, so in this media report, I put his screenshot up:
"Thirty-nine buildings on Haihua Island were ordered to be demolished, and the Middle Chronicle: Behind it is a distorted view of political achievements"
What question did he raise, there were three major violations of the sea flower island, the first was the illegal construction, the whole point was zero, through the way of the whole to zero, the illegal declaration, the illegal acquisition of this planning permit, and then, the illegal construction, at the same time, in this serious damage to the ecological environment, resulting in a large area of coral reefs, and the white shell was permanently destroyed, this is the second point, the third point, at the same time, there is also pointed out that what is a very serious point, through space isolation, in the sea to create a rich area, With our current common prosperity of this culture, social orientation, value orientation is seriously inconsistent, these three points are the sea flower island, objective facts and problems, but also, we are now in the Danzhou Administrative Law Enforcement Bureau, mentioned in the relevant issues.
Then, Sima Nan threw out his own views and opinions on this matter, what views and opinions, he put forward ten points, that the 39 buildings of Haihua Island should not be demolished, and most of these ten articles belong to nonsense.
First, he argues that this kind of loss, no matter the loss of demolition, whether it is for home buyers, builders or investors, is an irreparable loss, which is nonsense! Why, because for this buyer, in fact, there is no loss, and then I will throw out another piece of news to prove that the buyers of the owners of these thirty-nine buildings have all terminated the agreement with Evergrande, so this demolition mainly involves the loss of Evergrande's assets, and has nothing to do with the buyers. This first article, the fourth article he mentioned, the real should be punished is the violator, not the house itself, the house will not restore the ecology after demolition, or the bay, will only cause social unrest and huge wealth, destroyed in one fell swoop, I really do not understand is, if according to his theory, Beijing demolished a little seven hundred million square meters of illegal buildings, is not all should not be demolished, Jinan three years demolished, one and a half billion square meters of this illegal building, should not be demolished? This article, no matter what, the conclusion is untenable, and then the fifth article, saying this, the construction of the governance system, the starting point is to be responsible for the people, to maintain the ecology, to maintain our green waters and green mountains, it is precisely responsible for the people, (Sima Nan) These are all untenable, (such a ridiculous conclusion) can be thrown out in a dignified manner, there are a lot of people dancing wildly!
Such an obvious violation of The Flower Island is detrimental to the interests of all walks of life and to our ecological interests, and it is obvious that it should have been demolished long ago! It is true that it should not be dragged on, and the matter of demolition now, after Sima Nan's repeated up-and-down operations, has become a matter of safeguarding the interests of the people? (Illegal construction should not be demolished?) Instead of reversing black and white and fabricating facts, what is this? Let's take a look at this matter, another important media report related to this media report, this media report, from this "Daily Financial News", I put this "Daily Financial News", this original news screenshot also put up.
The owners of the proposed demolition buildings on Sea Flower Island have lifted their purchase agreements
The daily financial news report, when mentioned, the person in charge of the local relevant department, confirmed, what is it, said that these thirty-nine buildings, thirty-nine buildings to be demolished, once sold more than 200 sets. According to the official statement, Evergrande has terminated the purchase agreement with all the owners (this set of sold houses) in October 2020, that is, the house has been fully converted to what project owner, that is, Evergrande's own use, so the demolition does not involve the interests of the buyers at all.
If Sima Nan did not see this important information, or if he saw it, he hid this important information, and then characterized this matter as the loss of the people's wealth, and then brought up the next question, then did the illegal construction have to be demolished?
According to the relevant provisions of urban and rural planning regulations, Article 64 and Article 65, for buildings that generally violate the law, corrective measures may be taken to eliminate the impact on the plan, and may not necessarily be forcibly demolished, but if it is a serious illegal illegal construction that cannot be taken, corrective measures are taken to eliminate the impact, or if the parties do not stop construction and do not correct, they must be forcibly demolished.
So, is Evergrande a serious violation of the law, and is it not stopping construction and refusing to make corrections? Let's take a look at some relevant reports, so the investigation and punishment of Haihua Island began today, isn't it!
According to relevant reports, in 2018, Hainan Danzhou City down an emergency notice requesting that this Haihua Island stop, double suspension, that is, stop construction, suspend business, but a few months later, Haihua Island defied the government decree and quietly resumed work, in this, in October 2020, Hainan issued the second round of "Central Ecological Environmental Protection Supervision and Rectification Plan", which proposed that Evergrande Haihua Island Company did not implement the relevant requirements of the first round of rectification plan, illegal construction, resulting in illegal and illegal reclamation, this area is very large, ah, So in this case, he is continuing to build a new villa, and continuing to build a villa in 2018, which is a serious violation! Therefore, in this case, the impact of Hengda Flower Island belongs to the continued construction after being rectified, which is extremely bad! At the same time, because of the large size of Haihua Island, it has caused a very strong negative impact on this kind in China, so it is said that he belongs to the one who has seriously violated the law, but also belongs to the one who does not stop construction and refuses to correct, and in theory and regulations, he should be demolished! It must be dismantled! Then for this, the Danzhou Administrative Law Enforcement Bureau made this notice, Sima Nan believes that he belongs to the illegal and chaotic government, which is simply a big fallacy in the world!
Originally, the Danzhou Law Enforcement Bureau had the duty to stop violations of state regulations, so the demolition itself, within the scope of its duties, (originally) administered according to law, how did it become a violation of the law and chaos, violating the law of whose family? This is a very absurd thing, then there is such a large illegal building in the whole country, if according to Sima Nan's description, demolition is wasteful, waste of the people's wealth, all take back and reuse, what will happen. First, no one can dismantle illegal buildings, you look at the various kinds of each city, you look at this vicious growth of illegal buildings, can never be demolished, second, what problems will occur? Then the illegal building, can be the local relevant departments first recovered, and then secretly sent to the original owner to use, this does not bypass the policy supervision, so it will form an extremely bad impact, in the past there have been such precedents.
At the same time, such a large number of buildings to be demolished in the country are being demolished, such as The Hanbi Building in Qingdao, the villa in Qinling, the villa in the southern mountains of Jinan, the annual demolition of illegal buildings in Beijing is one point 700 million square meters, and the annual demolition of illegal buildings in Jinan is 100 million square meters, behind which are huge wealth that has fallen to the ground, if it is according to Sima Nan's divine logic, should it not be demolished? What about our green water and green mountains, that is, the golden mountains and silver mountains? What about the kindness we often talk about treating Qingshan, and Qingshan will also treat us kindly?
In the face of all this, why didn't Sima Nan stand up and jump out and say: Say that these things do not need to be demolished, and then let the government take it back and use it? Why, why don't you say it? Why, on the other hand, was Sima Nan particularly concerned about the matter of Haihua Island, in solidarity with an extremely bad incident that should be dismantled if it was administered according to law? Is Sima Nan's cognitive level low? Or is it deliberate? As an ordinary citizen, I also have the right to ask the above questions.
As for some sima nan's fans commenting that the completion is also allowed by the relevant departments to be built, it is not built in a day, and it should not be demolished when it is built, and it is even more absurd to say that it is wasteful to demolish it! So Qinling Villa, the southern mountainous area of Jinan, and the Qingdao Hanbi Building are also allowed by the relevant departments, not built in a day, and are not allowed to be demolished when they are built? As mentioned above, three similar projects to Haihua Island have been demolished, a sub-project of 400,000 square meters of Haihua Island, demolished in accordance with the law, how can it not be demolished, you tell me where is his special?! Just because this project is protected by Sima Nan, can't even distinguish what is right and what is wrong? If so, I really feel ridiculous for such a level of sanity!! Sadly, Sima Nan's fans, now they can't even find a reason for Sima Nan's defense, and what they say is completely illogical.
The content of today's analysis is based on the relevant authoritative media reports that have been objectively and openly published, which belong to scientific discourse, do not belong to my personal speculation, today's video, so far.