Recently, Sima Nan released a new video "Bianqin Reveals the Secret Of Cultural Colonization Series", which sounds like a full of "fist and patriotism", but the content is really surprising.
In the first issue of "Associated Press Presumptive Scar Literature", Sima Nan made a big fuss about "scar literature" as a cultural colonization of the West, a serious, populist sentiment in nonsense.
Western cultural colonization is not nothing, and in reality it is indeed very serious, but "scar literature" is definitely not, "scar literature" is a homegrown literary genre, is a conscientious Chinese intellectual's reflection on history, whether the name is named by Chinese people or translated by foreigners.
The origin of scar literature is very simple, that is, after the reform and opening up, some intellectuals who have personally experienced the past era reflect on the ultra-"Left" line and the sufferings brought about by it. On August 11, 1978, Lu Xinhua published a novel called "Scars" in Wen Wei Po, and since then similar literary works have been called "scar literature".
In fact, long before the publication of "Scars", there were similar literary works, such as Liu Xinwu's "Class Teacher". In fact, there was a type of work of "scar literature" first, and finally the concept of "scar literature" came into being.
"Scar literature" depicts not only the situation of intellectual youth, but also the vast number of revolutionaries of the older generation, ordinary urban residents, urban workers, and peasants, covering various groups in Chinese society at that time, and was a ten-year life picture of all Chinese.
The soil rooted in "scar literature" is the land of China, and this literary form and name are directly derived from the local area, not "imported products", let alone "export to domestic sales".
Westerners really want to make Chinese change their color spiritually through cultural colonization, so as to achieve the purpose of peaceful evolution, and the so-called "elite groups" that engage in knowledge theory, literature and art in China actively cater to the ideas of Europe and the United States are also very large, which is why domestic public knowledge once ran rampant.
However, "scar literature" is not an attack on New China, an attack on the socialist system, and a complete negation of the "Cultural Revolution", but the spiritual essence of scar literature, not a "little bourgeois-style moaning without illness", "intellectuals who have suffered for several days of misery and complaints", still less "cutting down the flag" and "slandering chairman Mao's era". On the contrary, from these blood-dripping words, every reader can feel the deep love for the country and the nation in the words, the desire to hope that the country will become rich and strong, and the persistence in exploring the truth.
It is true that Western countries have taken advantage of their superior cultural resources to carry out cultural colonization and spiritual colonization of China by seizing the commanding heights of public opinion and exporting ideology, but "scar literature" is difficult to use, because the value of "scar literature" is precisely to make Chinese reflect on history, love the motherland, and call on the people to cherish today's beautiful life.
If there is a definition, then the literary works advocated for cultural colonization are "well-known literature" rather than "scar literature".
There are many people in today's society who do not read books, do not think, let alone immerse themselves in a long novel, that is, it is difficult to read a large paragraph of text on a mobile phone. What follows is that when they pay attention to public affairs and express opinions, they do not understand the essence of things at all, and often look at the text, make subjective assumptions, and use other voices on the Internet as the benchmark for judging a thing, which suffocates independent thinking and encourages blind obedience and follows the current.
There is a possibility that public sentiment and public opinion will be swayed or misled, which gives many "opinion leaders" room to coerce public opinion and manipulate populism.
Once these spaces are occupied by "network pushers" and become a means for them to obtain improper benefits, "angry public opinion" will grow and spread uncontrollably, and real public opinion will sometimes be wrapped up in it, and sometimes helplessly become a silent majority, drowning in the "boiling of public opinion" and becoming unrecognizable.
Taking "scar literature" as an example, some people insist on taking the wind of public opinion as a bias, making a big fuss by taking advantage of the public's unfamiliarity with and ignorance of what "scar literature" is, wantonly inciting dissatisfaction, not only attacking and insulting "scar literature" for no reason, adding oil and vinegar to the creation of "original sin," equating it with "smearing" and "slandering," and now making a set of statements that "scar literature" is "planned" and "designed," and is a conspiracy of americans.
Sima Nan said this, he is really good at imagination, too capable of talking about it, too good at making news!
Americans and even Western societies must take a clear stand against the erosion of our culture, and we must maintain a high degree of vigilance at all times. As long as it is a CONSPIRACY AND TRICKER OF the United States, we will expose and oppose it with great fanfare, but we must never disregard historical facts and arbitrarily set up an "imaginary enemy."
It is worth vigilance that Sima Nan also recalled the old tune of class struggle in the video, using words such as "cow, ghost and snake god", which is not a good sign. However, this will certainly make some blinded people as excited and fanatical as if they had been beaten with chicken blood.
For Sima Nan, it does not matter whether his words are right or wrong, it is important to be sensational. Disguising public opinion and manipulating public opinion is his best trick.
In recent years, there have been too many incidents that have been exposed on the Internet and reversed, and it is only when the fog is cleared and the truth is revealed that the vast number of netizens find themselves "washed" and "parody".
For those "facts" whose information sources are not authoritative and clear, and for those "decryptions" that are contrary to common sense, if they cannot maintain a high degree of calm and rationality, the people's emotions will be consumed, and they will inexplicably become accomplices in online violence, and even encounter unexpected misdirection and even harm. For those who make biased and one-sided statements, we need to keep an extra eye on them to avoid being deceived, misled, and deceived.