@Teacher Zhao Hongwei Japan's diplomatic plus and minus are two major elements, domestic power struggle, and US pressure. The second level is the geopolitical relationship between China and Japan. However, not only rational, but also irrational dynamics

@ Teaching Craftsman Zhao Hongwei Japan's diplomatic plus and minus are two major elements, domestic power struggle, US pressure. The second level is the geopolitical relationship between China and Japan.

However, not only is it rational, but the irrational dynamic is also quite strong. Traditionally, there have been sneak attacks and wars since the Beginning of the Japanese War, up to Pearl Harbor; in modern Sino-Japanese relations, there have been Sino-Japanese friendships, as well as the foolishness of the Diaoyu Islands, such as the recently deceased Shintaro Ishihara's purchase of the island, which affected Noda's resistance from the Ministry of Foreign Affairs and forced the purchase of the island.

NHK's Taiwan has a sand table exercise, and I also watched it. The conclusion is that some laws are not enough to be used, the criteria for the use of force are not clear, and it is impossible to make decisions according to law. In fact, the current legal system leaves room for irrational decisions. The military and political elites who participated in the sandbox exercises aimed to demand continued efforts to develop a more radical legal system for the use of force.

Recently, Aso, Abe, and others have stressed that the problem in Taiwan is the crisis of Japan's existence, that is, the Japan-US alliance is in trouble, and they are trying to force the law. During the aforementioned sandbox deduction, Kono's question was that it was impossible to define whether there was a crisis in Japan. Revising the law again is not a day's work, and politicians simply use their mouths and mobilize public opinion to define it.