A breakthrough in doubtful evidence! Find out the facts of the corruption crime, grasp the facts that the conviction and sentencing of the defendant play a decisive role, and use the evidence to prove it. Including: (1) Identity of the defendant (2)

A breakthrough in doubtful evidence!

Find out the facts of the corruption crime, grasp the facts that the conviction and sentencing of the defendant play a decisive role, and use the evidence to prove it.

include:

(1) Identity of the defendant (2) Position (3) Time of crime (4) Place of crime (5) Means (6) Amount (7) Result (8) Whereabouts of dirty money and dirt (9) Whether the crime was committed jointly and its position in the joint crime (10) Role (11) and attitude of admitting guilt (12) Whether there were circumstances of voluntary surrender (13) confession (14) meritorious service.

In the case, it is presented that: (1) there is more circumstantial evidence than direct evidence, (2) more evidence is transmitted than original evidence, and (3) documentary evidence is more than physical evidence.

When using circumstantial evidence to determine a case, grasp it from the following two aspects:

1. The circumstantial evidence on which the case is based must be credible, sufficient, and form a complete chain of evidence, and the conclusion of the verification is exclusive.

For example, in a case, the various evidence collected includes: the real price list of the product, the bargaining process between the two parties, the means of arbitrage, the write-off of the closing documents, and the evidence of the whereabouts of the dirty money.

A large number of witness testimonies, physical evidence, and documentary evidence in the volume formed a complete system of proof, which conclusively determined the person's crime of embezzlement.

2. In cases where the defendant refuses to confess, and the evidence for refusing to confirm the case is insufficient and there are contradictions, it is not appropriate to determine it.

Doubtful evidence should not be reluctantly accepted when it is truly impossible to eliminate doubts, which is the premise for preventing unjust, false and wrong cases.