At the beginning of the criminal proceedings, the accuser seized on the other party's eagerness to get rid of the criminal coercive measures, and often forced the investigated party to mediate. In fact, early reconnaissance began to mediate against the detained one

At the beginning of the criminal proceedings, the accuser seized on the other party's eagerness to get rid of the criminal coercive measures, and often forced the investigated party to mediate. In fact, mediation at the beginning of reconnaissance is most detrimental to the detainee. Because the close relatives of the detainees at this time, including lawyers, are at an absolute disadvantage in terms of information, it is impossible to make a clear judgment on the case. Once the review and prosecution is initiated, the lawyer has a comprehensive understanding of the case through reading the case file, and if a verdict of innocence or felony is reached, it will affect the willingness of the accused party to mediate. Even on the basis of guilty light negotiation, the bargaining chips are reduced relative to the initial expectation of innocence. This is precisely why the accuser is willing to mediate earlier. Therefore, even if the accused is in detention in a detention center, unless the lawyer quickly makes a guilty judgment and there is room for forgiveness and commutation, mediation should not be "blinded".