I stumped Google's super-intelligent robot Bard today!
I asked him a question, and I asked him three times in a row. As a result, his three answers were: I don't know, I can't understand your question, your question is too difficult, beyond my ability.
But open AI easily gives a complete and philosophical answer. Therefore, the big language model developed by each household has its own strengths and weaknesses.
Google's super-intelligent robot, compared to open AI, the most powerful thing is that it is real-time online. So he can answer the questions that are currently happening. Instead of limiting its answers to events that occurred before 2021, as Open AI does. In the past few days, I have seen Google Bard's analysis and interpretation of Dao Lang's new song "Rakshasa Sea City" has its own characteristics. I'm going to write some of his interpretation into my next public account article.
P.S. My question to Google Superbot today:
Please elaborate on the following sentence written by evolutionary biologist David P. Barash: "A dead elk was found in Agnes Creek, which decomposed well. It's over." （“Dead elk in Agnes Creek decomposing nicely. Over.” Does this phrase have any deep meaning?
(In order for him to understand my question more accurately and deeply, I have attached the original English text to the key words.) As a result, he was still unable to understand and answer. However, from my point of view, being able to ask a question about a super intelligent robot still has a strange satisfaction in my heart. ）
