Yang Kun couldn't bear it! took the imitator to court, demanded moral compensation, and also involved Daolang

Singer Yang Kun suddenly sued a pair of Internet celebrities who imitated him in court, is he a "small belly chicken intestine" or "long overdue"?

After reading the specific experience, I'm afraid that even Daolang himself will give Yang Kun a thumbs up this time and praise him for "doing a good job"!

Yang Kun sued the Internet celebrity

Today, a short video blogger uploaded a video saying that he was sued by singer Yang Kun in court! And uploaded a photo of the contents of the complaint.

The blogger, who goes by the name of Sichuan Fanta, said that he and his partner each received a text message from the Beijing Internet Court two days ago, saying that Yang Kun had taken them to court for violating the plaintiffs' right to reputation, and demanded that they pay compensation for moral damages and apologize.

At first, the blogger thought it was a scam text message and ignored it, until the call came, and after learning about the situation, he knew that it was not a scam, it was true.

The blogger was not happy now, and posted a video saying that they were a funny joker and a fan of Yang Kun, and they just involved a few sentences of Yang Kun's song in the video, and they didn't name them, why were they sued in court?

The blogger was quite aggrieved, saying that the parody video he uploaded before was directly removed from the shelves shortly after it was uploaded, and even his account was blocked for seven days. Now that he was suddenly sued by Yang Kun again, he was also puzzled.

Judging from the blogger's tone and expression, it was quite aggrieved, after all, he still relied on this to eat, his financial route was suddenly cut off, and he was also angry in his heart, and his mouth was pursed.

The blogger also said that they are guys from the countryside, and the main reason for posting the video is to bring happiness to everyone, and they really don't understand how to infringe, and they obviously didn't name them.

After listening to the two bloggers, some unknown netizens think that Yang Kun's operation pattern is too small, right? Like other celebrities, they also have imitators.

For example, Lu Han's imitator Lu Ha, Yue Yunpeng's imitator "Central Plains Xiao Yue Yue", etc., no one said that they would take the imitator to court?

also said that these two post-90s bloggers are from the countryside, and it is not easy to eat, why did Yang Kun sue others and ask for a solatium for mental damage.

It wasn't until after watching the previous imitation videos of this pair of bloggers that netizens suddenly realized that Yang Kun's reputation had also reversed, and some people even said: Yang Kun waited until now to sue, and he was already very bearable.

Malicious imitation and personal attack on Yang Kun

This blogger "Sichuan Fanta" is a blogger in the funny area, and many of his usual images imitate Yang Kun's style.

From dressing up, to the small movements when singing, and the singing voice, almost all of them are copies of Yang Kun's, and the blogger even named his image "Ah Kun".

Although the blogger himself did not mention the name of "Yang Kun", everyone knows who he is imitating, because this "Ah Kun" is very obvious.

Just like Ah Kun's usual video and live broadcast image is like this, he also said that he held 32 concerts and served as a good voice mentor.

Even when he was live streaming and filming videos, he also put on a logo background board imitating the logo of "The Voice of China" to verify his identity as a "Voice Mentor".

And this information is exactly what Yang Kun revealed before.

Yang Kun served as a mentor in "The Voice of China" before, and mentioned many times in the show that he had held 32 concerts. It can be said that the meaning of "Ah Kun" is meaningful, and it is not too obvious.

At the beginning, everyone watched Ah Kun as a fun. After all, there are too many celebrity imitators, and the results of the show are very good, such as Jay Chou's imitator "Porridge Cake Lun", which was ridiculed by netizens and said, "I announce that Jay Chou won the last place in the Jay Chou Imitation Competition, and Porridge Cake Lun is the first"!

And Ah Kun was like this at the beginning, imitating Yang Kun's unique singing skills, with a little bit of ridicule, and everyone loved it.

But this style gradually changed. I don't know if he was not satisfied with the current traffic, Ah Kun began to "take risks" and personally attacked Yang Kun.

In the video, the partner asks Ah Kun, "Aren't you the one who pulls the Kun"? Ah Kun's eyes widened and he told his partner that it was a dog's name and that Ah Kun was a person!

Ah Kun's image imitates Yang Kun, regardless of whether it is a joke or a joke, scolding the other party for being a dog, is this kind of joke really interesting? This has escalated to a personal attack, right?

And later, it was even more excessive, Ah Kun was no longer satisfied with such a ridiculous personal attack, and began to stir up trouble, saying that "Ah Kun" has "died", is it something that you and the kid surnamed Dao picked up at the beginning?

The friction between Daolang and Yang Kun is also well known to everyone, but this blogger should not have involved Daolang. Does involving Daolang make the joke funnier? Not really.

And when Ah Kun said this, there was already a barrage to leave him a message, telling him to persuade him to be more restrained, otherwise there will be times when you cry. It's just that Ah Kun at that time had just tasted the sweetness of traffic, so how could he give up?

Ah Kun rubbed Daolang's popularity more than once. Ah Kun used Yang Kun's style to stage the Titanic with his partner "Yingzi", and shouted "The kid surnamed Dao is back for a concert, but his existence has set the Chinese music scene back 15 years" and other remarks, and whether it is live broadcast or video, it is frequently expletive.

To be honest, there are many people who imitate celebrities, but personal attacks also rub off on other people's popularity, and it is not funny at all when vulgarity and controversy are funny.

So netizens said after carefully picking up the imitation videos of these two people, after watching the blogger say that Yang Kun sued him, everyone still thought that Yang Kun's pattern was small, but now that they look at it, it was too late for Yang Kun to sue them, and they have been bouncing for so long.

In fact, generally speaking, celebrities do not have so much malice towards imitators, but the reverse is not necessarily the case.

Just like the previous netizens spoofed Lin Junjie's dancing, Lin Junjie responded: If you just want to get happiness by adding strange music to the performance clip, please don't come to my concert next time, and said very seriously, this is not funny and disrespectful.

For Lin Junjie, the work is equivalent to his child, he respects the work very much, and he does not want the work to be spoofed.

A joke is only called a joke when both parties think it's funny, and if one party doesn't think it's funny, then you still question that you're "joking", is that right?

And this response to the blogger is obviously evasive, saying that he did not name and imitate Yang Kun, nor did he target him, there was no critical content, and others imitated it, why did he be accused himself?

But the blogger didn't say why he scolded "Ah Kun" for being a dog, why he still had the popularity of "the kid surnamed Dao", and didn't explain why he wanted to attack him personally.

Play memes in moderation, and the same is true for celebrities, if you go too far, it will become a personal attack. If there is no bottom line for popularity, then it will not bring laughter to everyone, and it will go against the original intention of the funny video.

Therefore, I hope that all bloggers can take this as a warning, play memes in moderation, do not go overboard, and do not make personal attacks, causing trouble to others and disrupting the network environment. So what do you think about this? Do you support Yang Kun's approach?

Information sources: