Hello everyone, I'm Bells~
Since Yixing announced that it was going to make adjustments, and announced the adjustment content, many players said that this announced that the redo of the hero of Yixing had failed, and then a large number of players in the game began to discuss the heroes who failed to do the rework, such as Mengqi, Baiqi, Lianpo and other heroes, as long as they experienced redo, they would be labeled with the title of failure, to be honest, Bells did not understand.
It is true that in the game everyone spits on the planning, spit on the beauty of the sky, which is basically a habit, as long as there is a little action, basically there will be players to start to spit out, which is very normal, but for the problem of hero redo, really have to look at objectively, because there will be a large number of heroes will be redone in the future.
The background of the current glory of the king, that is, there are already a large number of heroes in the game, more than a hundred heroes, everyone knows that the launch speed of new heroes will be slower and slower, and now basically maintain the rhythm of a hero in each season, here can also give you an exact news, the new shooter is already in production, will meet with everyone in the near future, should be S28.
And the speed of hero launch is slow, there are a large number of old heroes in the game, these heroes appear at a very low rate, basically are unpopular heroes, so instead of racking their brains to design new heroes and new stories, it is better to salvage old heroes, that is, redoing, so these seasons down, redoed heroes are not in the minority, and will be like this in the future.
But the failure of redo, really need to be objective to look at, at least in this direction, Bells feels that planning to salvage the old hero is a very good choice, because many of the old hero's IP is very good, the story is also very exciting, compared to the current new heroes, one after another are a word name, to be honest, may not really think of any good name.
And what is the standard for the success and failure of the hero after the redo? It seems that many players think that the redo of an unpopular hero, success must represent a complete turnaround, such as the previous appearance rate is 1%-3%, after the redo must be close to 20% to be successful, is it really only from the appearance rate to judge?
For example, Mengqi, the hero's previous appearance rate is very low, almost invisible to the player to use, after redo is also experienced a series of insults, but in the eyes of The Bell, after redoing at least better than before, this is a successful redo.
Before the full segment of Mengqi almost no players use, high segment a small number of players to use, and after the redo of the Mengqi, although the appearance rate did not significantly increase, but the Mengqi play diversification, play wild AD, against the road AP, and the high segment of the appearance rate and performance are very good, can often be seen in professional games, these situations show that the reworked Mengqi is slightly better than before, better than before, why is it a failure.
Looking at the adjustment of Yixing, a large number of players feel that they have failed, which makes it difficult for Bells to understand what everyone is thinking? The hero of Yixing was almost unpopular from launch to redo before, and almost no players used the full segment.
But after the redo of the star, the tactical status has become very high, high segments to professional games are hot single heroes, many times even need Ban, its appearance rate and play and role comparison before, the rise is not a grade, but the redo of the star is now actually players say failure, then the bell can only say that everyone's requirements are not generally high, perhaps only designed to always have a stable appearance rate and high and low segments to eat, at the same time not weak and not strong, Heroes with a considerable winning percentage and fun will think that it is a success.