Honda Haoying's A-pillar material is poor, which is already a well-known thing. Two authorities have confirmed this. One is that in the crash test of China Insurance Research Institute, the A column has a serious bend. One is to understand the dismantling of it by the Emperor of Che and find that the material used in the A-pillar is very bad.
[1] The speed of the collision was only 64 kilometers per hour, and the A-pillar was seriously bent
Although the results of the final crash test show that haoying's safety is able to meet the needs. However, we should also clearly understand that the crash test of The China Insurance Research Institute is only a crash test at a speed of 64 kilometers per hour. There is still a big difference between the traffic accidents that occur on our actual roads. If we were faster on the actual road, the consequences would only be more severe.
Picture note: Haoying bent the A column during the collision test session of China Insurance Research Institute
[2] Understanding chedi dismantling found that Haoying's A-pillar material was very bad
Honda Haoying's A-pillar part, the middle layer uses C-grade steel, tensile strength is only more than 600 MPa, the inner layer is stronger than the middle layer, tensile strength of more than 800 MPa. According to the grading of the car emperor, it belongs to the B-grade steel. In such an important part as the A-pillar, C-grade steel is used with B-grade steel. On the other hand, the price is less than half of haoying's fit, and in the A-pillar part, two layers of B-grade steel are also used, so from the perspective of material strength, Haoying is even worse than fit.
The part of Haoying's B-pillar, the middle layer is made of B-grade steel, and the inner layer is made of C-grade steel, which is still a combination of B-grade steel and C-grade steel, similar to A-pillar. Looking at the previous measurement data of the car emperor, the B-pillar part, Haoying is the second B-pillar material strength of only 1000 megapascals after the Wuling Hongguang MINIEV. Wuling Hongguang MINI EV is a very cheap mini car priced at only 28,800 yuan, so such a comparison, you know how bad haoying's materials are.
[3] Haoying's A-pillar material is not as good as Fit, only better than Wuling Hongguang MINI EV!
If you compare the use of Honda Haoying's A-pillar material with other models, you can more obviously find the problem.
On the list above, S-rated is the best, followed by A-rated, B-rated, C-rated, D-rated. We found that the Haval H6 among the independent brands uses the best materials, the middle layer of the A column and the inner layer of the A column, which use S-class materials.
Some joint venture brands and other independent brands either use A-level, or S-class and C-level, D-level high and low collocation.
The three worst performing models on this list are the Honda Fit, the Wuling Hongguang MINI EV, and the Honda Haoying. Fit has two B-class, Wuling Hongguang MINI EV has a C-class and a D-class, and Haoying has a C-class and a B-class. Therefore, Honda Haoying's A-pillar material is not as good as Fit, and it is better than the Wuling Hongguang MINI EV.
It is incomprehensible that a 200,000-yuan-level joint venture brand compact car has such poor materials. What is even more infuriating is that this situation only occurs on domestic models. The CR-V of foreign countries with the same platform as Haoying uses 1500 MPa steel in the body strength of A-pillar, B-pillar, and lower side beam of the body. The steel strength of domestic Haoying is only half of the overseas version. This kind of market differentiation in different countries is what makes Chinese consumers most chilling.