Have money to have children?
No, see if you want to experience that painful and happy feeling, and see how much you want to see your baby. Birth and upbringing cost money, but it's not unbearable either. As long as you don't throw it away, Ping An can raise a little guy or a working boy. Nowadays, the reason why urban little guys are raised is because many of them are spent in preschool education, training classes, children's parks and other places, and the effect is not great. As long as you don't compare eating, drinking, and wearing, in fact, the consumption level of the average family is completely satisfied.
Why is it that the more developed the place, the more people are reluctant to have more children?
Why is it that the more developed the place, the more reluctant people are to have children. We are all very strange, in the eighties and nineties when the country is not rich, the people are not rich, why at that time everyone dared to have children, the average family is several, now the country is rich, the people are also rich, then why do not dare to have children, the birth rate of the mainland has declined year by year, the birth population of newborns has also declined year by year, although the two-child policy has been relaxed, the birth population has a rebound, but now the birth rate of the second child is declining, what is the reason why we dare not have children.
After the liberalization of the two-child policy, the newborn birth population in the mainland has rebounded and then declined rapidly, with a decrease of 2 million newborns in 2018 compared with 2017, and a decrease of 2 million newborns in 2019 compared with 2018. Now having children is completely different from the eighties and nineties, in the 60s as long as you wear more chopsticks to eat enough, now giving birth to children is a requirement of quality, dress well, use well, and apply for various cram classes. Those who can afford it also have to buy school district houses for their children.
It can be clear that high house prices are a more important factor leading to the current decline in fertility rates, and higher house prices mean higher the cost of buying a house. Now a child may have just enough to live in the house, if there is another child, the house is not enough to live, is it necessary to change the big house, change the big house to have money.
The traditional thinking of the mainland is that marriage will buy a house for the children, although it will take more than twenty years to buy a house for the child, but according to the current trend of China's house prices, the house prices in twenty or thirty years are estimated to be higher.
Can't have children without money?
First of all, there are not a few families with this idea, and the state has vigorously promoted the second and third children this year, and various policies have continued, in fact. That is to adjust the society because of "money" and do not want to have children of the family, followed by the soaring price of today's society, raising children is indeed invested in a relatively large, parents will not be because of their own embarrassment and slow to treat the child, eat well, drink well, dress well, but also need to give the child a good education, various reasons will bring a relatively heavy burden to the family, do not want children will not experience that pain and happy feeling.
Why the poorer you are, the more you like to have children
Because if people are poor, this kind of thinking must be a bit feudal and conservative! They will definitely think that their children are better, and when they are old, they will have a pension! This can lead to a poor education for the child! Because having a child is the easiest, as long as there is a child, don't think about how to raise him, how to give him a good life, how to educate him to be a good child, because laziness is a bad cycle known to passers-by: poverty, more children; more children, the more embarrassing the family.
The poorer the living, the poorer the poorer, it seems to be a dead knot. Poverty alleviation in poor areas basically stays in the stage of "giving money", there is no "giving affection" and "giving heart", and there is no process of generating value rationality. Therefore, the result is nothing more than changing the face of material poverty, but it cannot change the "sequelae" left by material poverty.
For children, parents and all the poor, "giving a mermaid" is the simplest and most fulfilling thing. But in fact, this kind of assistance does not fundamentally change anything. The local culture has not changed, the village rules have not changed, the values have not changed, the stereotypes have not changed... The problem is not at all with the parents, but with the mindset of the institution designed to help them seek radical change.
Due to the influence of many children and blessings of the traditional ideas, can alleviate the pressure of children's old age, children do not have to worry about being bullied by others, some places still have the concept of son preference, can not always have boys, they feel that there is always a child can move forward.
Of course, in recent years, because the large trumpet training has been abolished, the reborn trumpet has been retrained!!!!