5 bad news came, India's tax department suddenly investigated Huawei, the US Asia-Pacific assistant secretary reiterated its support for Taiwan "rock solid", the United Kingdom wants to invest 25 million pounds to "strengthen Indo-Pacific security", NATO expressed concern about China and Russia upgrading their nuclear arsenals, and the United States accused China of reneging on its free trade commitments
With the rise of China, our contribution to world peace and development is obvious to all, but there are also some countries that cannot correctly view the development of the mainland. Right now, 5 bad news is coming, let's take a quick look.
The first news, according to indian media reported on the 16th, the Indian tax department conducted a surprise inspection of the offices of China's Huawei Technologies Co., Ltd. in Delhi and Gulgram. Indian officials said Huawei was searched because of "tax evasion charges." The tax department investigated Huawei's operations in India as well as overseas operations. Huawei also responded that it would fully cooperate with the government department's investigation.
This is not the first time that India has targeted Chinese companies, not to mention the similar raids on OPPO and Xiaomi before, and recently banned 54 Chinese applications on the grounds of "national security". This also makes us reasonably doubt that India's successive targets are really really this case, or are we looking for reasons to suppress the development of Chinese enterprises?
Fairness is in the hearts of the people, mainland enterprises abroad must strictly abide by local laws and regulations, if the verification of these allegations is not true, the Indian side must also make responsible explanations. The cooperation between China and India is mutually beneficial to the two peoples, and the Indian side also needs to maintain an equal and respectful business environment between the two countries.
The second news, on the 17th, the US State Department of Asia-Pacific Affairs Assistant Secretary Kang Da said at a telephone news conference that under the one-China principle, the United States' support for Taiwan is as solid as a rock, and it will be committed to maintaining peace and stability in the Taiwan Strait region and will continue to help Taiwan have "self-defense capabilities."
It is worth noting that the White House has also recently released an "Indo-Pacific Strategy", many of which directly mention China, but also carries Taiwan-related private goods, announcing that it will invest more energy in the Indo-Pacific region to deal with China's "establishment of a sphere of influence in the region" . In this general direction, the US Asia-Pacific assistant secretary's statement on the Taiwan Strait has a different significance. How to deal with China's development, one of the important means of the US side is to "use Taiwan to control China."
Biden has repeatedly expressed his hope that the situation in the Taiwan Strait will maintain peace and stability, but in fact, he has not pulled gangs and factions to play the "Taiwan card" and release misinformation. The security of the Taiwan Strait region really depends on the maintenance of the People's Liberation Army and the joint efforts of the people on both sides of the strait.
The third news, according to the Russian Satellite News Agency reported on the 17th, after British Prime Minister Johnson and Australian Prime Minister Morrison talked, the United Kingdom plans to allocate 25 million pounds to support security and stability in the Indo-Pacific region, and the money will be used for maritime security and stability, dealing with national threats, strengthening cyberspace and other aspects.
Since the United States expressed its focus on the Indo-Pacific region, the "hardcore allies" of the United States such as britain and Australia naturally have to make a statement, and the dialogue between Johnson and Morrison has not less talked about xinjiang, the South China Sea, the Taiwan Strait and many other Chinese internal affairs. The so-called investment of 25 million pounds to maintain security in the Indo-Pacific region is presumably also a plan to focus on China.
Peace and stability in the Indo-Pacific region are closely related to the interests of the mainland, and China will firmly maintain the stability of the surrounding situation. If Britain and Australia are eager to make a move and want to engage in any joint military operation to "show off their muscles," they will certainly be resolutely countered by the mainland.
Fourth news, on the 16th local time, NATO Secretary-General Stoltenberg said that after meeting with the defense ministers of NATO member states, NATO allies expressed concern about the escalation of nuclear arsenals between China and Russia. Today's tension in Ukraine is caused by NATO's continuous "arch fire", and the turmoil in Europe has not been calmed, but NATO has set its sights on China and Russia, which is really ill-intentioned.
If it comes to nuclear arsenals, the country with the largest number of nuclear warheads in the world today is the United States, and when it comes to "security threats", the United States is the well-deserved first, while China has always maintained the number of nuclear warheads at a minimum level that meets the needs of national security.
Speaking of the nuclear submarine agreement reached by the United States, Britain and Australia, this does not involve violations of nuclear non-proliferation principles, they themselves know best, NATO wants to act as a "teacher", or first look at what they do.
The fifth news, the Office of the United States Trade Representative said in the annual report on the 16th that China has failed to fulfill its commitments to the World Trade Organization, "China's policies and behaviors have challenged the premise of WTO rules", and the United States will continue to pressure China through the WTO.
Speaking of free trade, we can't help but ask the United States, is it in line with the rules of the WTO for the United States to suppress Chinese enterprises without authorization and launch a "tariff war" against China? The mainland has explained the accusations of the US side, and the so-called excessive subsidies to domestic companies are also untenable. Even the WTO has ruled that the U.S. tariffs on China violate WTO rules, and that China can impose tariffs on $640 million worth of U.S. imports to make up for the damage the United States has done to China.
The potential of the Chinese market is obvious to all, and the US side's abuse of political means to destroy the market environment is harmful to others and not to itself. #Huawei responds to Indian tax authorities' surprise inspection of multiple venues##India bans 54 Chinese apps on national security grounds##Huawei was raided by India's tax authorities##WTO ruled that China can carry out trade retaliation against the United States every year##U.S. ##Sino-US##World Nuclear Arsenal##NATO##China condemns the United States and Britain for undermining the Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty##Britain##Ukraine##外媒: The United States announces the "Indo-Pacific New Strategy" ##台湾 #
