The "History of Song" records such a sentence: "Sweep away the evil of the two kings, and illuminate the emperor Song Wangu." ”
The "second king" is the father and son of Wang Xizhi and Wang Xian, and the "Zha" refers to letters, handwriting, and ink.
The first person in ancient and modern times who regarded the Erwang inkblot as a bad za was Nonehime, and this sentence also came out of his mouth.
Here's the thing: One day, Emperor Huizong of Song summoned Mi Fu to the palace to write.
"Mi Qing, I heard that you were the first person in my calligraphy, and today I invited you to come and write for the screen of Yuan."
"Your Majesty does not suspect that the courtiers are rude, and the three ministers are in the grass, and the counselors are grateful for the affairs of the world." Sorry, Zhuge Liang ran the wrong set.
Mi Fu would also be grateful, after all, writing for His Majesty was something that could not be asked for.
At this time, Mi Fu was both excited and nervous, and his hand trembled and he picked up the brush, he thought not about what to write, but what to say after writing.
"One piece, two pieces, three or four pieces, five pieces, six pieces, seven or eight pieces..." After writing, with a snap, Mi Fu threw the brush on the ground and shouted at the screen: "Sweep away the evil of the second king, and illuminate the emperor Song Wangu." ”
At that time, Emperor Huizong ordered Mi Fu to write the contents of the "Book of Shangshu and Zhou", but I only had primary school culture, and the only thing that remained in my mind was this poem by Qianlong, so I borrowed it.
Some people believe that in order to compliment Emperor Huizong, Mi Fu deliberately slandered the Second King to praise the Zhao and Song Dynasties, which was actually against his will.
It is not impossible to do this, the coast of the land, can not be the king's subject, in the face of the world's number one, who dares to say No, do not want to live.
If there is an element of disobedience in this sentence, then is it also against the heart that he attacked almost all Tang Dynasty calligraphers?
Come and go, excerpt a few "Famous Sayings of Haiyue" for you to look up:
Ouyang inquired about the Temple of Daolin, and there was no spirit in the cold thrift. Liu Gongquan Guoqing Temple, the size is not commensurate, and it is exhausting.
Liu Gongquan shi Ou is not far behind, and is the ancestor of the ugly monster Evil Za. There have been popular books since the Liu Dynasty.
Ou, Yu, Chu, Liu, Yan, all a book, arrange labor-
Xu Hao's strength in his old age was even more spineless... Dong Xiaozi is not empty, all are evil in his old age, and there is no charm at all, and this self-knowledge knows it.
Tough enough, right? Not enough, he said in the Treatise on Cursive Writing:
Zhang Xu's vulgar son changed the ancient law, and only ordinary people thought that he wrote well; Huai Su could not be high and idle, and his works could only be hung in the country liquor store.
All the famous calligraphers of the Tang Dynasty were criticized by him for being meticulous and unsaved.
If you still feel that this is against your will, this concludes the article.
Don't write? Think beautiful! I thought I didn't know you wanted to paddle away, ahem, I wouldn't let you get away with it!
A person who does not take the Tang Dynasty families into account, if he lives in the present moment, what will he say in the face of today's various calligraphy masters?
"It's all so-and-so!" Mi Fu is suspected of making inappropriate remarks and has been banned.
Suppose he is the leader of the book association, and maybe (I mean probably) he will say to the calligraphy masters: You can't write like this, respect the tradition;
Suppose he is a member of the book club, and may say to the calligraphy masters: You do everything, that is, you do not engage in art;
Suppose he is a melon eater, and may say to the calligraphy masters: All so-and-so.
Due to mi fu's repeated inappropriate remarks, he has been banned!