The TV series "Armageddon" is currently being broadcast, I don't know if you have noticed that in the updated plot, it is not Lin Biao, nor Fan Hanjie, but Chiang Kai-shek who wants to launch a decisive battle in the northeast. Why was Chiang Kai-shek anxious to launch a decisive battle with our army in the northeast?
The TV series "Armageddon" takes the Liberation War as the background and tells the three major battles of Liaoshen, Huaihai and Pingjin from the three levels of strategy, tactics and combat. In the updated plot of the play, we will find that the person who most wants to fight a decisive battle in the northeast is not Lin Biao, let alone Fan Hanjie, but Chiang Kai-shek, who provoked the civil war. Why was he so anxious to fight a decisive battle with our army in the northeast? I think everyone must have overlooked a problem, that is, the economic situation of the National Government at that time. #电视剧大决战 #
Does Chiang Kai-shek understand military affairs? Why did he blindly command?
It is estimated that many viewers will hear the Evaluation of Chiang Kai-shek by Kuomintang officers in many TV dramas with the theme of the Liberation War, that is, he always blindly commanded at the crucial moment of the campaign. So the question is, does Chiang Kai-shek really understand military affairs? If he didn't understand military affairs, how did he lead his Huangpu protégés in the Northern Expedition?
If Chiang Kai-shek does not understand the military, I think this statement seems to be less objective. After all, Chiang Kai-shek has been in charge of China for so many years, and China is in a period of war and chaos. Who fought those previous battles? But if he knows the military? Why did Chiang Kai-shek's Huangpu protégés say that he was blindly in command?
Why is it said that Chiang Kai-shek did not understand military blind command?
I think the reason why the Kuomintang officers said that Chiang Kai-shek did not understand military blind command was a completely helpless angry remark. Because it was the blind command in the three major battles of Liaoshen, Huaihai, and Pingjin that caused the remnants of the Kuomintang to retreat to the isolated island of Taiwan. In the beginning, it was Chiang Kai-shek who provoked the civil war, and it was he Chiang Kai-shek who demanded a quick war. The reason why he blindly commanded the war situation was because the economy of the Nationalist government did not allow Chiang Kai-shek's army to continue fighting.
This brings us to a new question, that is, Chiang Kai-shek's Nationalist government has the support of the Americans, but why can our army continue to fight with the Kuomintang army? I think the root of this problem lies in the "people".
It is precisely because of the people's support for our army in the war that our army has reduced the costs needed for war.
In the plot of the latest episode of "Armageddon", we will find that Chiang Ching-kuo's action of "fighting tigers" in Shanghai has been resisted, why did Chiang Ching-kuo allow Chiang Ching-kuo to touch the foundation of the party-state? All because Chiang Kai-shek hoped that Chiang Ching-kuo could indirectly increase the national government's fiscal revenue through his economic reforms and "tiger fighting" actions. Because of the years of war, the National Government was no longer able to maintain its war machine.
Although our army does not have the assistance of the Americans and occupies a vast number of villages, we have the support of the people. It is precisely the people's support for our army in the war of liberation that has enabled our army to reduce the costs required for the war. For example, the migrant workers who deliver supplies to the front line have joined the ranks of transporting food and ammunition to our army on their own initiative. Chiang Kai-shek's Kuomintang troops, on the other hand, needed money to do anything, but the salaries dragged on for months.
Why is the TV series "Armageddon" a MAJOR REVOLUTIONARY HISTORICAL TV SERIES? All because the play shows the audience the three battles of that year from the three aspects of strategy, tactics and combat. The play also expounds from another angle what is the choice of the people, and it is the support of the people that we have achieved the final victory.
I don't know how everyone views Chiang Kai-shek's performance in the three major battles? You are welcome to leave a comment.