Positive view of the quick comment: borrow the cute baby to make a profit, do not let the "raising baby" become the "raising number"

With the increasing popularity of short videos and live broadcasts, many parents also like to share their cute baby daily on the Internet, attracting the attention of tens of millions of netizens. However, with the increase of homogeneous content, many accounts have begun to "find another way", and there have been deformed patterns such as 2-year-old children eating broadcasts and wearing cute babies who are not wet in diapers to cook in the kitchen. (CCTV Finance, December 23)

Behind the short video of Meng wa, it is often some parents who use their children to create accounts as business to operate. Open some account homepages, most of them can see "good things recommended" and "find me official cooperation" and other logos. Some parents even said that they could earn 150,000 yuan a month by relying on their babies.

Parents have nothing to blame, but the deformed baby for the purpose of pursuing profit has long deviated from the track of normal sharing. In the final analysis, the cute place can be loved by people precisely because of the innocence they bring. However, the deformed baby of some parents is often at the expense of their children's innocence. On the one hand, parents who borrow cute babies to make profits are at ease, but on the other hand, their children's physical and mental health is abandoned.

Making a 2-year-old child into a food broadcast, letting a cute baby who is not wet in diapers go to the kitchen to cook, can be described as throwing aside the safety and health of the child, and there have been extreme cases of 3-year-old eating broadcast being fed to more than 70 pounds by parents. There are also many five- and six-year-old children imitating the tone of adults and telling all kinds of funny passages; there are also children who skillfully pick up foundation and eyeshadow and teach everyone to make up in front of the camera... Ignorant children say things that do not match cognition, and behave in ways that do not match their age, and the impact on their psychology and cognition can be imagined.

Behind the cute baby video, there is often a potential harm of overexposing the privacy of children, which will inevitably lead to criticism in the field of public opinion. Two days ago, the news of a parent in Shandong sending a video of their children sleeping naked rushed to Weibo's hot search. The reason why the video is controversial is precisely because parents ignore the protection of their children's privacy while using their children to make money. The child's parents appeared very innocent after being criticized by public opinion, attributing it to malicious editing by netizens, but they did not know that it was the reason why they did not measure up to the money of the baby that caused the result of being criticized.

Children are the treasures of the family and society, and should not become the "treasures" of parents to make money. It is common for parents to want to show their babies, but don't "raise a baby" in the name of "raising a baby", let alone take this "nibble on a baby". Behind the profits of the deformed sunbathing baby, it seems that he has earned a lot of money, but he has made the child lose the most precious innocence and childlike fun, and also let the child bear the burden of not matching the age. When the child grows up one day, sees the self that is over-consumed in the video, and sees the self who is used as a tool to make money, will he really not blame his parents?

In early December, the General Office of the Ministry of Culture and Tourism issued the Opinions on Strengthening the Protection of Minors in the Online Cultural Market, which explicitly prohibited the use of "net red children" for profit. The "Opinions" clearly require strict control over minors' participation in online performances, and strictly handle live broadcast rooms or short video accounts that appear to be minors appearing on camera alone or brought on camera by adults for more than a certain period of time and that have been approved to accumulate popularity and seek benefits with the help of minors. The introduction of this opinion means that making profits from "internet celebrity children" is not only a family affair that will be condemned by public opinion, but also a state affair related to the healthy growth of minors, and also puts forward higher requirements for platform supervision.

Caring for children's innocence and creating a healthy growth environment for them is the responsibility and obligation of parents. Under the ban, those parents who borrow cute babies to make profits should also converge, don't wait until the account is blocked before regretting it!