Car reviewers, have been played into a derogatory term by our line, a variety of open-mouthed car review articles on the Internet flooded, technically no level, moral bottom line, to meet the running train. The nonsense you can see is not terrible, what is terrible is the serious nonsense that can make you believe!
I also write car reviews articles myself, so I see that black and white are reversed, misleading consumers, and even laymen impersonate it, which is even more resentful, and the following is a classification, hoping that everyone can polish their eyes. All car reviewers don't believe it, including me, and all the information they see must be screened and judged by themselves.
First, the routine flow:
1, I have driven the Corolla, also driven Qin PLUS, finally understand how big the gap between domestic and joint ventures, I advise friends who buy domestic cars to think twice, otherwise it is too late to regret ...
I have driven Boyue, but also driven Tiggo 8, and finally understand how big the gap between Chery and Geely is, I advise friends who buy domestic cars to think twice, otherwise it is too late to regret it...
3, my cousin is a car repairer, I am a car major, I have worked in a 4S shop, my car is XXX... Later, I summarized the major shortcomings of XX cars, and advised those who bought XX cars to think twice, otherwise it would be too late to regret it.
4. Some people ask, why don't old drivers buy domestic cars? He crackled a lot of specious reasons, saying how domestic cars are not good, the next question, why old drivers do not buy joint ventures, this time said how the joint venture how to pit - left and right jump, wall grass, there is no opinion and opinion of their own.
This kind of car reviewer has a strong creative ability and summary ability, and the writing has obvious traces of chicken soup. However, there is almost no professional knowledge, all of them are in the clouds, and they do not have their own views and opinions. Because they have strong creative ability, good writing, and even understand some reading psychology, the article has a high reading rate. However, because they do not understand the profession, in order to harvest traffic by any means, they are not responsible for their own content at all, and the misleading of consumers is the most serious. What they write may not be all wrong, but it is more difficult for the average reader to discern.
Screening method: Find the left and right jump, play a variety of routines, just block the author.
Second, the recharge stream:
Recharge itself is no problem, big V has traffic, car companies need to publicize, through the flow of big V to increase the exposure of products, this is actually beyond reproach, just rice well... However, some rice can be just right, and some rice is really poisonous! I don't talk about others here, just myself. My coffee position is not worthy of being recharged, but the platform will always have some submission tasks, promote certain models, and if you win the lottery, you will also get a contribution fee, which can be regarded as a recharge. I have also written this kind of article, basically I can win the lottery, but some meals, I dare not eat, because if I eat, my conscience will hurt.
Talk about why - if the products of car companies, product strength, and cost performance are almost the same, then I really recommend anyone. This power point, that low fuel consumption point, this large space point, that material use point - there is always a desirable point. However, in the eyes of the layman, this is the case, in the eyes of our insiders, the product is divided into three, six, nine and so on! People have to die more than people, and goods have to be thrown away! Let me recommend those goods that have to be thrown, that is, pit people, this thing is done, my conscience can't get over!
In fact, all the big V, especially those with a team behind them, can't have no recharge, unless it's still in the "entrepreneurial stage", I think, recharge is not a problem, the problem is, don't pinch the rice! Take the money and run the train with your mouth full, in the final analysis, you have to be responsible for your own words.
Third, spray traffic flow
In fact, even if I spray traffic, spray Volkswagen, spray Nissan, spray Honda, spray Toyota, but I do not admit that I am a car black, because I am telling the truth, not smearing. Of course, I also criticize domestically, which I admit is not fair enough, and domestic cars are criticized softly. Like my spray traffic, it is considered to be self-extinguished to recharge, I am particularly worried about myself, like I do this, how to make money ah? Sadden me.
There is still a difference between spraying and black, spraying is relentless criticism, while black is spurious, out of touch with reality, or magnifies a little shortcoming. Spraying is based on facts, while black is nonsense. Tesla, for example, has a legal department, and the people who hacked it, a lawyer's letter, basically apologized and deleted the post. But spray it is not afraid, because it is justified. The article I sprayed it on is still there.
How to distinguish this kind of car black? It depends mainly on whether what he is saying is true or not.
Fourth, the whitewash flow:
This should be regarded as a kind of recharge stream, but there are also some who have not recharged and also coaxed. The main logo was re-created according to the official press release, mainly blowing the exterior interior. This kind of thing is actually harmless, no matter what tough lines, technological modeling, you just blow out the flowers, things are there. Everyone's aesthetic is different, the same car, you think it looks good, I just don't like it. It's a matter of opinion. I write car reviews, rarely mention the exterior, interior, some are also passed. Unless there are some details that are easy to overlook.
This kind of article or video, as long as you filter some useless information, itself is not nonsense, the effect and significance of publicity are also there, after all, not everyone can go to the scene to see the car, this kind of car review is of practical significance, but the current style is slightly exaggerated. For example, brother tiger said that the car, people are equivalent to receiving advertisements, will not mislead you.
Fifth, double standard flow:
The easiest place to make a fuss is the driving experience, almost all models, handling and comfort are definitely contradictory, racing cars can not be comfortable, in order to pursue the limits of handling, can only sacrifice comfort. If you want comfort, you have to sacrifice control, which is very simple. Therefore, the double standard is very simple, the same car, you can say that it is well controlled, you can also black it has poor comfort. It depends on whether you want to praise or degrade.
There are also many double standard car reviews, the same lap results, saying that A car is outstanding, saying that B car is to be improved.
Finally, let's take a small test and see if you will screen the car reviews? Let's take two simple questions:
1, A will recommend models according to the needs of riders, not fixed domestic or joint venture, nor fixed brand. B always recommends the same brand of models, rarely recommends others, and even jumps out of the category given by car friends, such as people to choose in the joint venture car, B has to recommend domestic production, people budget 90,000, B has to recommend 100,000. A and B Who is more professional?
2, A is a 30-year-old driver, B is a 20-year repairman, C is a 4S shop sales, D is a second-hand car dealer, E is a car company engineer, who should you ask when choosing a car?
Think about it, use your own logic to see the essence through the phenomenon. The answers are announced below:
The first question, the probability is that B is more professional, in fact, I also said in the text, in the eyes of professional people, the product power of the car is almost clear at a glance. What technology is used, what experience is improved, compared with similar products on the market, how cost-effective it is already in mind. You are right to say that people have their own advantages and disadvantages, but the level and ability of people are different, and the same is true for cars. People have to die more than people, and goods have to be thrown away! A recommended according to the requirements of the car friends, the surface is to respect the choice of the car friends, in fact, and the mud, he himself may not know which car is better! In B's eyes, many of the needs of riders are nonsense - you don't want domestic production, you want to joint venture - are you professional? Do you know whether domestic production is better or joint venture? You don't know what's the point of asking for this? That's what professional people think. For example, you go to the doctor and ask: I have a headache, is the athlete's foot used externally or internally? The doctor told you that the internal service was finished? Does he have to tell you that beriberi does not cure headaches, you have to come to ibuprofen?
The second question, I know all these people, and these people have asked me about buying a car. Not bragging, there is a specialization in the art. The old driver can only drive, he does not understand the car, and normal people may not drive more than 20 cars in a lifetime. Repairmen are only able to repair cars, they have been in contact with the old cars that are out of the insurance, and the new cars are rarely contacted, because during the insurance period, they all go to the 4S shop. The repairman of the 4S shop only understands this brand. And used car dealers, to be honest, the level of education is generally not high, may be more familiar with the second-hand car market, but the information and technology they have mastered are outdated. The engineer of the car company is also, I know that is the study of the engine, I often learn from people, when I asked what car to buy, I was also shocked - I have to say that the level of people is not the same, he said very reasonable, in the field of engine he is an expert, but choose a car, contrast, combined with the price to analyze the product force, and then consider the personal economic ability and demand to choose a car, for him is a new field, but not as professional as me.
Should you believe me? No, see the first sentence: No one should believe it, but they must screen and judge for themselves.