After Sima Nan asked Lenovo seven questions in a row, it aroused a lot of attention. However, Sima Nan has limited information, most of which are public materials, although it can be "the spear of the son, the shield of the attacker", but also occupies the moral high ground, but it is easy to be seen by some professionals, such as the calculation of assets, the flexibility methods often adopted by enterprises in order to raise funds, and so on. On the Internet, ordinary people, based on simple cognition, basically sided with Sima Nan, believing that he was "the guardian of the law" and "the embodiment of justice".
Sima Nan has been tearing, but Lenovo basically does not accept the move, the public information shows that in addition to the initial dispatch of a beautiful female secretary about "tea" and later in the form of news issued a specious statement, Lenovo or Yang Liu basically did not have any response, there is a kind of "unchanged to respond to changes" determination, of course, the so-called "unchanged" is "ignore", "do not respond" "do not interfere" (there may be implicit interference).
But just when Sima Nan opened fire on Lenovo fiercely, a financial expert named Zhang Jie came out of nowhere, which can be described as "stirring up (Lenovo) Zhou Tian's cold thoroughness." Because Zhang Jie himself has considerable financial expertise, extremely eloquent, and family origins, the family out of three academicians, grew up in the Chinese Academy of Sciences, not only familiar with the history of Lenovo's family, but also familiar with the history of Liu's origins, for a lot of details and even palm to understand a lot, a series of videos, slow and rational, clear, logical, in-depth and simple, eloquent, can be described as elegant and popular appreciation, won the recognition of many people. Especially on a large platform, after the confrontation between Teacher Zhang Jie and the so-called experts who support Lenovo and support Yang Liu, there are countless fans.
Zhang Jie's comments on Lenovo, basically every issue I will watch, as long as there is a little more time, listen to a paragraph, but also can be regarded as a loyal fan of Teacher Zhang Jie.
But Zhang Jie's new issue of "The Association of False Charity in the Nursery" I have a different view. In this video, Teacher Zhang Jie explained in detail how to make a lot of money through charity, which really made people shine, suddenly realized, and exclaimed "so it is" - long knowledge, long insight!
But then, Teacher Zhang Jie brought out a "Liu Dashanren", saying that this person used charity to amass wealth, and while amassing wealth, he also mutilated babies "more than seventy corpses of children were buried in the cemetery, and there were no living babies in the nursery." And this "Liu Dashanren" Liu Xin is the grandfather of Liu Chuanshan (who later changed "Shan" to "Zhi").
So, what is the purpose of telling such a history? Don't you just want to show that the "willow" in the "willow" on the cusp of the storm, unscrupulous means to get money, is a family inheritance?
But in fact, this statement is not appropriate in itself.
There is no problem with Willow, I dare not draw conclusions, there is a high probability. But Liu's grandfather made a lot of hypocritical wealth and even carried a bloody case, and the grandson had problems, at least it aroused people's associations, which belonged to a more typical "bloodline theory". The Shaanxi Dialect song "Tell the Truth" has a few famous sayings: Man is a man Turtle is a turtle, the horn is a copper pot is an iron Lao Tzu hero good man, ta da (father's meaning, the author's note) sells onions and garlic. Our old sayings include "the door will be out of the tiger" and "the tiger father has no dog", although there is a certain truth in terms of probability, but the negative examples are too numerous to mention.
In the case of Yue Fei, his 21st grandson Yue Zhongqi, loyal to the Manchu Qing, was called by Qianlong as a "giant of the three dynasties". And the Manchu Qing is actually Jurchen, and the Jurchen Complete Yanbu established Jin, which is the opponent that Yue Fei wanted to defeat by "returning my rivers and mountains". After the Unification of the Jurchen Ministries in 1616, the Qing Taizu Nurhaci also established "Jin", but in history, for the sake of differentiation, it was called "Hou Jin".
And Qin Ju, who killed Yue Fei that year, bore the name of a traitor all his life, but his great-grandson Qin Ju was a famous general of the Southern Song Dynasty against Jin, and in the fourteenth year of Jiading (1221), when the Jin invaded and attacked Puzhou in the south, Qin Ju led the crowd to resist the enemy, was outnumbered, and sacrificed himself with his son and daughter, and after his death, he was also named the Marquis of Liehou (Qin Ju's nickname "False Ugly").
You see, what the ancestors oppose is supported by the descendants; the ancestors treasoned to the enemy, but the descendants died on the battlefield - can you say that the bloodline has any decisive role?
In ancient times, we committed major crimes, and often wanted to exterminate the Nine Tribes, which was called "chaos after the end" -- this kind of punishment was extremely cruel, and behind it was the "theory of blood".
Sin is not as good as family, which is the basic principle of the rule of law. Whether Liu is guilty, how big the crime is, the key is whether he has embezzled state-owned assets, whether he has betrayed national interests or even security interests, whether he has used various wrists to obtain extremely high salaries for himself, and even after retirement, he has a sky-high pension.
If there is, then naturally there is a corresponding responsibility, the skynet is restored, the omission is not leaked, and no one can be extrajudicial.
But if not, you can't just accuse him or of a crime because his ancestors lost their conscience—what's the difference between that and the annihilation of the Nine Tribes?
Of course, taking 10,000 steps back, even if Liu is not guilty, I am afraid that moral responsibility is inevitable - high salary is certainly a hard wound, which is not in line with traditional morality and does not conform to our development goal of common prosperity.
But in any case, he could not be associated with his grandfather--the grandfather had great merit and could not atone for the crime; the grandfather had a great sin and could not give it to future generations.
Besides, Liu is an adult, and the things he does, only he himself can resist, which is also the proper meaning of the law!
Regarding the history of the Liu family, especially the enmity and resentment of jin Yong's Cha family and Liu Chuanshan's Liu family, we can tell; if the dozens of skeletons in the nursery can be found out and the truth of history can be restored, this is a great thing, people cannot be resurrected from the dead, but history should give a conclusion.
However, when everyone is talking about associations and talking about Willow, especially Willow, moving this history out, although it is in the way of "miscellaneous talk", it is inevitable that people will have associations - not the question of whether the content is right or wrong, but the question of timing and inappropriateness.
On this issue, there are different views from Teacher Zhang Jie, just some personal thinking that they think is rational. It does not affect my admiration for Teacher Zhang Jie - daring to risk "drinking tea" or even receiving a summons at this time to unveil the dark curtain of a super processing plant, which is originally a hero's doing!
Hats off to Teacher Zhang Jie!