I don't know what kind of festival exists between Zhang Jie and Wen Tiejun, Zhang Jie has attacked Wen Tiejun many times.
However, just as Mo Yan ignored Mao Xinghuo, Wen Tiejun has always ignored Zhang Jie.
Recently, Zhang Jie quoted a self-media content and launched another attack on Wen Tiejun:
First, the question of whether Wen Tiejun visited or visited the Yasukuni Shrine was actually turned out and hyped by Zhang Jie once in 2022, and the incident actually happened in 2004.
Second, Wen Tiejun did not know whether Wen Tiejun had been expelled from the party and public office because of the above-mentioned behavior, and said that he wanted Wen Tiejun to refute the rumors, and claimed that "not speaking is tantamount to acquiescence."
Third, Zhang Jie said that Wen Tiejun's illegal organization was banned. I don't know about this, and I didn't find it on the Internet, but Zhang Jie just said this, but he didn't provide evidence, and I don't know if he has evidence.
Fourth, Zhang Jie attacked Wen Tiejun for taking money from the Ford Fund in the United States, but the information I found showed that Zhang Jie deliberately took this out of context and used Mao Xinghuo's indiscriminate methods.
The above is about the Ford Fund in the United States, which was investigated and sorted out by the following author, proving that Zhang Jie took this out of context to smear Wen Tiejun:
Let's focus on Zhang Jie's first and second articles. These two are actually two sides of the same coin, and the focus is naturally on the first point, that is, the question of whether Wen Tiejun should visit or pay homage to the Yasukuni Shrine.
Now the common view on the Internet, which is also the view that Zhang Jie used to attack Wen Tiejun, is that entering the Yasukuni Shrine is to pay homage, and there is no such thing as visiting, because the sign of the Yasukuni Shrine reads:
However, these people only emphasized the words "it is forbidden to visit the shrine for purposes other than worship" and "enter the shrine", and ignored the words "without permission" in the middle. This is typically taken out of context.
If connected, the meaning of "" is completely different from "". The former means that permission is required to enter the country for other purposes.
So, can you enter for other purposes? This is complicated to say. Obviously, on the Japanese side, especially the Yasukuni Shrine management, they will certainly not allow other purposes to enter, and they will only allow them to enter and pay homage.
However, whether or not to worship is not only a matter of personal inner thoughts, but also an external manifestation, and there must be a ritual of "worship", that is, to offer pine branches and insert pine branches to those enshrined ghosts.
When talking about Wen Tiejun's visit to the Yasukuni Shrine or the question of paying homage to the Yasukuni Shrine, a self-media author talked about one thing his political teacher told them as follows:
In other words, there are indeed cases where anti-Japanese people try to get in or get permission from the Japanese side in order to understand what is going on inside.
Speaking of which, it is necessary to cite the example of the cycle of 1985. Zhou Erfu was a great writer, who was then the vice minister of culture, and led a delegation to Japan to participate in the commemoration of the 35th anniversary of the establishment of the new production seat.
After the event, in order to complete the novel "Ten Thousand Miles of the Great Wall", he expressed his desire to visit the Yasukuni Shrine in Japan and declared it to the Chinese Embassy in Japan. The embassy did not dare to make a decision on its own, so it asked for instructions from China, but the time was a step too slow.
Zhou Erfu didn't have time to wait for domestic instructions, so he went to visit the Yasukuni Shrine without authorization, and the domestic instructions arrived that night and were not allowed. After returning to China, Zhou Erfu was expelled from the party.
However, Zhou Erfu has been complaining to the organization, explaining in detail that the reason for visiting the Yasukuni Shrine is to write the novel "Ten Thousand Miles of the Great Wall" during the Anti-Japanese War. Finally, 16 years later, the Central Commission for Discipline Inspection made a decision to restore Zhou Erfu's party membership.
From this point of view, the government has indeed conducted a dialectical analysis of Zhou Erfu's behavior and respects the facts, that is, Zhou Erfu, who wrote a long novel about the War of Resistance Against Japanese Aggression, entered the Yasukuni Shrine definitely not to pay homage, but indeed to write a need, and there is no ideological problem.
In order to understand the need to understand the truth, you can enter the Yasukuni Shrine, and those who hold this view also have to skull. Of course, Chop Saddle was later banned because of this, and he was also cyberbullied.
There is also Jiang Wen, who compared Yang Zirong with the fact that he has also been to Weihu Mountain, saying that the nature of visiting and visiting is different.
Jiang Wen stressed: The existence of the Yasukuni Shrine, which is the spiritual front of Japanese militarism, shows that we need more literary and artistic works and academic works that profoundly expose its evil nature.
And two Chinese travel bloggers once entered the Yasukuni Shrine to secretly take pictures, and the real situation inside was only known to the Chinese. So is it necessary to know the truth? And their actions were not only not condemned at the time, but were praised all the time, and the video was widely reposted.
Returning to the question of whether Wen Tiejun visited or visited the Yasukuni Shrine, it also depends on his purpose. According to Wen Tiejun's later "Folk Japan": First, Wen Tiejun said that he went to the Yasukuni Shrine himself, and since this is the case, he was naturally frank; second, it can be seen that he also entered the shrine to understand the truth.
Of course, if you insist that "entering is to pay homage", then Wen Tiejun will also have a hard time arguing. However, Wen Tiejun will not respond, because it is the same whether he responds or not, and those who think he is visiting the shrine still think that he is worshipping.
However, as for whether Wen Tiejun was expelled from the party and public office because of this, Zhang Jie said that "not speaking is tantamount to acquiescence", which is completely ridiculous and shameless, and the judge will not convict the criminal suspect in this way.
Zhang Jie said this, which is nothing more than a response to forcing Wen Tiejun, but Wen Tiejun will not bird him in 2022, and he will not bird him now. The correct logic is that whoever asserts is the one who gives proof. Since you said that Wen Tiejun was double-opened, you should come up with evidence.
The content quoted by Zhang Jie comes from a self-media with the screen name "Jian Rui Mo Nong Walks Life". opened his article, but found that he said that Wen Tiejun was double-opened, and he didn't show any evidence at all. That's it, Zhang Jie can believe and transfer.
This "sword sharp ink walks life", claims to be a "best-selling author, screenwriter of gold medal works at international film festivals", but does not say what works he has.
And judging from his writing, he is not worthy of the titles of "writer" and "screenwriter" at all. Reading his article, the mouth is very strong, and it is full of personal prejudice.
Is there an inevitable relationship between positive energy and his background? Is there an inevitable relationship between Wen Tiejun's "self-proclaimed expert in agriculture, agriculture and agriculture"? Most of Wen Tiejun's followers are peasants and peasants.
Whether Wen Tiejun claims to be an expert on agriculture and agriculture, take a look at the official media. Search for the word "Wen Tiejun" on the Internet, and there will be a lot:
People's Daily Online, CCTV Network, CCTV Network, and the Party School of the Central Committee of the Communist Party of China, these media are all the highest. I don't know what to think of this "sword sharp ink walking life"?
See what he said about Wen Tiejun:
He said that Wen Tiejun was fired, without showing evidence, and that Wen Tiejun is now an idle person, which is even more nonsense. Let's take a look at Guangming.com's introduction to Wen Tiejun after 2004:
Zhang Jie can find out these contents, and even he should know them completely, but he still quotes the nonsense of "Jian Rui Mo Nong walks his life", and what does he say "not speaking is tantamount to acquiescence", is it shameless?
Let's take a look at what "Sword Rui Mo Carries Life" said below:
He said that he has always believed that the fact that a very small number of peasants have repeatedly asked the state for this and that and put forward unreasonable demands, which is directly related to Wen Tiejun.
It is clear that it is he who "personally always thinks", rather than showing evidence, and saying that Wen Tiejun has a grudge against the government after being double-opened. It's bloody.
Excuse me, are the peasants now in opposition to the government? Are the pensions demanded from the government by the peasants? Isn't the pension a policy of the government to benefit the people?
Besides, in the past, the development of cities and industry was given priority, is this not true? Is it wrong for Wen Tiejun to say that he should now give back to the countryside and agriculture?
Let's take a look at how this person attacked Ma Shushan:
The last thing I want to say is that if you type the word "Zhang Jie" on the Internet, there will be no effect like Wen Tiejun, but all of them are his personal self-media, and the content is complex, and the account points out "financial observation", but in fact, everything is observed.
Therefore, Zhang Jie and Wen Tiejun, which is higher and which is lower, is clear at a glance. Zhang Jie's proudest and often talked about is his "Zhongguancun".