Stay-at-home dads are an industry?
Ye Liu replied affirmatively in the show that full-time dads are an industry.
Now the industry is 996, and the full-time father is 007, with the child all year round, it also creates value, saving a part of the nanny fee, chef fee, childcare fee...
You can save tens of thousands of dollars every month, and if you save it, you will earn it!
This sentence affirms the value of "full-time dad", but also affirms the social value of "full-time mom".
"Full-time Dad" advocates that the hardships of men with babies can resonate with full-time mothers without offending women, and ironically satirize the harsh responsibility of today's society for full-time babies by showing the plight of men with babies.
From the perspective of the work itself, it breaks the stereotype of "male outside, female inside", which can be said to be a topic of equal rights that is worth exploring.
But it is such a logically unintentionally offensive, well-intentioned work that has attracted a lot of scolding from netizens, "Full-time dad is really bad", "full of patriarchal gaze", "too worth scolding"...
In "Full-time Dad", Gu Yufeng complained that he was tired and tired of working overtime, and he couldn't make any money, and he envied his full-time father for "easy", "just a relaxed", "so relaxed".
The name Zhang Chi seems to have been forgotten by everyone, and replaced by "Six Six Fathers".
Taking the baby led to "a lot of pressure", "very tired", "not even sleeping well", taking off the sunglasses, and hanging a huge black circle on the face of Zhang.
In order to take care of the children, Zhang Chi "has not been out of the community for six months", and has no time to play basketball, play mobile games, watch movies...
Because of the profession of full-time baby, Zhang Chi lost his life, career, and hobbies.
These netizens jokingly called "the little pain of full-time fathers" reflect the biggest problem in this work: what is different from full-time mothers?
It is not that if a man is mentioned, he must mention a woman, but on the basis of the reality that full-time mothers are tens of thousands of full-time fathers, it is inevitable to avoid the control group of "full-time mothers".
Just as the performance has not officially begun, there are many netizens in the bullet screen who have left comments, "Mom is also ah", "Isn't it the same for full-time mothers?" "So it's not easy to say full-time"...
When the audience found that the point of mentioning full-time fathers in the work, it was also true to change to full-time mothers.
They don't even have to breastfeed their children like stay-at-home mothers, they don't have to get all kinds of diseases due to childbirth, and they don't encounter all kinds of employment discrimination when they return to work...
What happened to stay-at-home moms is what is shown in "Mom's Monument", or even more so.
For this reason, the vast majority of the audience is unable to empathize.
Watching the actors on the stage complain, "play in the pain", soothe emotions, hug the group to warm up, shout slogans, the real feeling of many audiences is - the men's self-intoxication and pretense!
What is surprising is that this work is really that it is purely sympathetic to full-time dads.
Even after the performance, there is no such polite remark as "because I have experienced being a full-time father, so I can better understand the hardships of full-time mothers".
This work, as Huang Chengcheng hoped, is just to bring some positive and positive influence to those stay-at-home fathers who are confused and frustrated.
It is a matter of pride for fathers to feel that they are not ashamed to bring their children.
On this comedy stage that reflects and satirizes reality, "Stay-at-Home Dad" completely bypasses the huge, common, and more oppressed groups, leaving aside the intention of calling for equality between men and women and sharing family responsibilities.
I believe that many people can't help but ask a rhetorical question - what about the full-time mother who has not been seen for her efforts and hard work?
"Not seeing" itself is an offense, not to find it funny, only to feel chills.
This stage is called "industry observation competition", and the keyword eye is observation.
At the beginning of the work, Zhang Chi teaches the children to shout "Daddy", and the children shout "Mother", "Grandma", "Fourth Uncle and Grandpa", and the children here are about one year old.
But after three or four months, the child doesn't have to burp.
The contradiction is so contradictory that one can't help but wonder if the creators really watched carefully? Have you really been with children for a long time?
From the beginning, Zhang Chi taught his children to shout that their fathers should wait and see, ashamed to admit their identity as full-time fathers, which reflects the world's prejudice against men and women, and the pain points that do not conform to social expectations.
In fact, both men and women, it is very hard to carry a baby full-time.
They are just different divisions of labor in the family, and they are all worthy of respect, so they call for equality between men and women, which is a very valuable idea.
But the logic of the content of the work presented is that men should not have done this, so it is particularly difficult, so it makes people laugh.
The opposite of difficulty is easy, which is the default that women are naturally suitable for being full-time mothers, setting off the "originally would not have, but hard to learn" Dad is more difficult and greater.
But mom and dad are all at the same starting point, and no one is born with children.
In terms of character setting, "Jingdong Dad" is an excellent product manager, and he can be regarded as a subjective will to return to the family to take care of the children.
And Zhang Chi and "Daddy" are forced to become full-time dads because of their unsuccessful careers, and I don't know if the full-time dads in reality have been offended?
In fact, many people choose to take a baby full-time not because of career failure, some are also based on the consideration of the economic strength of both sides, but more of a starting point is to better take care of and raise children.
The slogan "Eat the softest meal" is even more wrong, its basic explanation is an incompetent man who is fed by a woman, or a husband who relies on his wife's nepotism for profit...
This is to erase the value of the contribution of full-time baby, as long as there is no income is a rice worm, as long as there is no money to support the family is the biggest original sin.
Finally, the whole cast of the actor to attract the new father into the group, not to help the novice father, not to join the group like the mother to learn parenting knowledge, but to hug the group to warm, such a motivation setting is really out of the spectrum.
"Stay-at-home dad" is a more dramatic and conflicting topic than "stay-at-home mom."
If the creators have carefully observed life, they will find that everyone with a baby is the same hard work, more painful and difficult than the full-time father, and the superficial content cannot resonate with the audience.
The uniqueness of stay-at-home dads is that as a man, he breaks into a group of predominantly women.
He was faced with the embarrassment and embarrassment of being in a hurry and asking his mothers for advice.
The stereotypes of working men and traditional fathers are naturally contrasting, conflicting, and funny with babies, and prejudices are even more so.
At this time, the "full-time dad WeChat group" repeatedly mentioned in the program is also reasonable, and even desperately hopes to have such a WeChat group.
The identity of "full-time dad", which can strip the public of stereotypes of men while empathizing with full-time mothers, is the best point in the whole work.
Regrettably, the creative team moved their own superficial content and did not accurately capture the real pain points.
Perhaps controversy is not a bad thing.
The above pictures come from the Internet and are infringing and deleted.