Traffic violations are commonplace in the hustle and bustle of the city, but when these violations turn into blatant road rage, the problem becomes serious.
The actions of a black car owner have sparked heated discussions on the Internet, not only because of his traffic violations, but also because of the ensuing conflict with a delivery boy.
This is not just a simple traffic dispute, but a serious test of public safety and social morality.
Loading...
The incident took place at a busy intersection
At about 7:33 a.m., a man turned on a red light at the intersection of Xidawang Road and Hongyan South 2nd Road in Beijing, and the vehicle was supposed to stop and wait, but the black owner was unwilling to simply follow the rules.
He could have legally waited for the signal to change in the right-turn lane, but with a car blocking him, he chose an illegal and dangerous path – a direct lane change over a solid line and into a non-motorized lane.
This was a clear violation, but the owner's risky actions did not end there.
On the non-motorized road, a delivery boy who was waiting for a red light became his obstacle.
Instead of waiting patiently, the black car owner repeatedly honked the horn, trying to urge the takeaway brother to get out of the way.
However, the delivery boy ignored it and stuck to his position, which in his eyes was undoubtedly enforcing his right to wait for the signal light in his own lane.
Unexpectedly, the owner's patience has clearly reached its limit.
As the horn sounded again, his emotions exploded, and foul language escalated from his mouth.
Although the takeaway brother was angry, he only fought back with words, and there was no actual excesses.
However, the black car owner didn't think so, and finally chose the most dangerous solution: he slammed on the accelerator, passed by the takeaway brother, and bumped into the takeaway brother.
This scene not only captures the flashpoint of a person under pressure, but also reflects the self-centeredness and aggressiveness of some motorists in current society.
He arrogantly praised the 5 million three-party insurance he had purchased in the group
After the incident, things did not subside.
Instead, the black car owner involved shared a video of the dashcam in a WeChat group, accompanied by a controversial comment.
He said that he had paid 1,000 yuan in compensation for the conflict, but his words revealed a sense of unrepentant satisfaction, "I lost 1,000 yuan, but I felt more comfortable." ”
What's even more shocking is that he arrogantly praised the 5 million three-party insurance he bought in the group, as if it made him feel that any behavior could be solved with money.
In response, the people in the group reacted strongly, and some questioned that his behavior should not encroach on the bicycle lane, let alone deliberately hit people.
The owner's response was provocative: "Take the bike lane, you can afford to pay the fine." ”
This attitude not only demonstrates his contempt for the law, but also exposes a dangerous mindset that can ignore the rules of society and the safety of others as long as they can bear the economic costs.
Hot comments from netizens
actually said that he was insured for 5 million, I don't know how to ask everyone, if it is a deliberate collision insurance claim?
If you dare to believe it, you will lose 1000.
What is it that is not intentional? The chat history also shows that it was intentional
This takeaway brother seems to have never seen money, only 1,000 yuan, still in Beijing
It's a big deal
In the follow-up development of this incident, the intervention of the Jinsong Brigade of the Chaoyang Traffic Police marked the escalation of the situation.
The involvement of the police is not only a response to a traffic violation, but also shows that if an intentional accident is detected, it will turn into a serious case of infraction.
The police statement made it clear that if the investigation revealed that it was a deliberate accident, the driver involved would face harsher legal consequences.
In this case, it is not only a matter of traffic fines, but also criminal liability, as intentional hitting involves a serious threat to public safety and personal safety.
From a legal point of view, what do you think about this?
From a legal point of view, the actions of the black car owner are not only typical traffic violations, but are more likely to involve serious violations.
Compaction lines and driving into non-motorized lanes already constitute traffic violations, which are not allowed under any circumstances.
Further, he deliberately drove close to or even tried to crash into the delivery boy, which has entered the realm of criminal offenses and may constitute intentional injury.
If we peel back the arrogance of the driver who can solve all problems with money, we will see a clear deviance within the framework of the law.
His actions show contempt for public safety and disregard for the lives of others.
In the eyes of the law, no matter whether your three-party insurance coverage is 500,000 or 5 million, it cannot be your talisman against others.
The purpose of insurance is to provide financial security in the event of an accident, and it is never used to pay for "upfront costs" for illegal acts.
In addition, his flaunting on social platforms and his contempt for fines further exposed his contempt for the law.
The law is not a golf club, you can't enter and exit at will, and after paying some fees, nothing happens.
Laws have their solemnity and are designed to maintain social order and protect the rights of citizens, not to give the green light to those who think they can settle everything with money.
A few final words
If the police investigation confirms that this is an intentional act, the driver will not only face serious legal consequences, including but not limited to fines, revocation of driver's licenses, and even criminal liability.
It should also serve as a warning that on public roads, anyone is bound by the law, and any attempt to use economic advantage to evade responsibility will be severely punished by the law.
What do you think?
#头条创作挑战赛#