Recently, the United States has been vigorously manipulating the Taiwan Strait issue to contain China's development, and this intensity has become more and more intense with the changes in the internal national conditions of the United States, which is also caused by the complicated situation within the United States.
Loading...
Under the fierce competition between the Democratic Party and the Republican Party in the United States, the performance of Biden, as the current president of the United States, is really difficult to describe during his tenure, so he urgently needs to make up for his declining approval rating by quickly achieving outstanding achievements in international strategy, and it is clear that only China can fill this role.
However, after several aggressive diplomatic tactics of the United States were defused by the mainland, the United States was a little angry for a while, so it sent Blinken to demonstrate to the mainland. Interestingly, it was at this juncture that mainland Foreign Minister Wang Yi met with the media and focused on the Taiwan Strait, the Yellow Sea and other regions in which the United States intervened, as well as answering whether the United States would impose a series of military sales on the Taiwan region and whether it would reunify Taiwan with force.
In this regard, Foreign Minister Wang Yi said that peace is the goal that the mainland has always pursued, but if it wants to separate Taiwan because of foreign interference, then the mainland will also take all means to counteract and will never let it go.
This sentence was obviously addressed to Blinken, who came with a purpose, and the United States behind him, and after Blinken's attitude towards China failed again and again, on the last day of his visit to China, Blinken also admitted that insisting on one China is one of the United States' propositions.
After all, although the United States has verbally recognized the one-China principle, we all know that the United States has always been adhering to the one-China principle to properly buffer Sino-US relations.
For example, this time, in order to prepare for sanctions against China, the United States has issued a number of bills, from blocking Chinese companies to sanctioning the economic system, almost all the means that the United States can think of have been used. It was really determined that there was no way to start, and after China could not get any bargains, he frankly admitted that he would stop with the one-China principle.
But to be honest, apart from this commitment, the United States has not made any appropriate adjustments to its diplomatic layout, and it is still providing billions of dollars in aid in the Taiwan Strait, conducting joint military exercises with China and the Philippines, and still not withdrawing the missiles deployed in the Philippines. Considering that the United States has changed its face on the one-China principle many times during the Biden period alone, we have reason to believe that the so-called one-China principle recognized by the United States this time does not have much value.
However, unlike the previous times, although the mainland is speaking to the media this time, considering that Blinken is also visiting China, this attitude is also to the United States.
This also indicates that the mainland has long since ceased to be interested in the foreign policy of the United States, and no longer reacts to the United States' remarks of saying one thing and doing another, and this media reply is more like a warning that the United States must never touch the bottom line again, otherwise it will inevitably be sanctioned by the mainland.
But whether the United States can receive this information and react, this is not clear, what we can see at present is that at least Blinken still reacts to this warning, China has received so many warnings, Blinken has more or less restrained his original attitude, and he will inevitably re-analyze the strategy in the United States after he returns, and he will be more cautious on the Taiwan issue.
Generally speaking, the mainland's counterattack with the United States this time can be described as a beautiful counterattack, from Blinken's initial unbridled rhetoric to the final one-China principle. This change in attitude is precisely the result of the mainland's reasonable diplomatic mediation.
At the same time, this also indicates that the United States' grassy attitude on the Taiwan issue has gradually ceased to work, and if the United States continues to use the one-China principle as a smoke screen to continue to interfere in the Taiwan Strait issue, it will inevitably meet with a strong counterattack from the mainland in the end.