Europe and the United States hype up the China threat theory in this way, which is a bit incomprehensible, China's high economic efficiency has now become a black spot, you say hype up the military threat, we still think it is like a thing, but to say that China's economic efficiency is unfair to Europe and the United States, this is a bit nonsense.
In the past few years, the West has smeared China's economy in various ways, such as the New York Times, in which they reported that China's exports were falling and they were likely to drag down the world economy, and the rapid growth of China's exports, which they reported would threaten the employment of other countries, and would also drag down the economic growth of other countries.
In short, if China's economy fails, the world will be unlucky, and if China's economy is good, the world will also be unlucky. This is a bit outrageous, so what is China going to do?
When U.S. Treasury Secretary Janet Yellen came to China a few days ago, she kept saying that China had overcapacity, and U.S. Trade Representative Katherine Tai was more direct, claiming that China's economic production system is simply incredible in terms of efficiency, and that China cannot be allowed to develop like this, otherwise it will be too unfair to the United States and Europe.
In the past, when China only produced low-end products such as socks and shirts, the West did not feel overcapacity, and when China could produce high-tech products such as chips, mobile phones, and large aircraft, the West felt that we had overcapacity, which was unfair to the West?
Is it a mistake to develop too quickly with too high efficiency? What a fantasy, how much prejudice the West has against China, to put it simply, it does not recognize China, you are different from us, your kind of efficiency is non-market-oriented, your kind of efficiency is unreasonable.
I think this may be the core problem of the Sino-US game, the West realizes that China is developing rapidly, but it can't come up with a countermeasure, so it begins to deliberately smear China, and then finally evolves into competition and game, and evolves into suppression of China's development.
Maybe we should go slower and wait for them? Otherwise, the West will come up with countermeasures, and the Chinese are so afraid, this will be involved in the whole world and provoke Europe and the United States.
Now it takes several years for the United States to add a guardrail to the subway station, and it will take more than ten years for the United Kingdom to build a bridge, and China is too efficient, which is a threat to Europe and the United States.
The essence of the game is competition and cooperation, not confrontation, obviously this kind of hard reasoning for the sake of suppression is too low-level, the West is not trying to improve its own efficiency, but choose to decouple and break the chain, de-risk, etc., which is itself a kind of regression.
There are many differences between China and the West, but this does not mean that China is wrong, China's development is obvious to all, and the decline of the West should be found in itself, not to blame China for developing too fast.