Words!
The so-called "emergence of the Cultural Revolution ideology" and "ultra-leftist ideology flooding the Internet" are a kind of rhetoric.
That is, first define that everything during the "Cultural Revolution" was bad and "ultra-left", and everything now is good and cannot be questioned.
Then, to criticize others' doubts about some current phenomena and the aftertaste of the good phenomena of the past is the "Cultural Revolution Ideology", that is, the "ultra-left".
This kind of rhetoric itself is precisely the inheritance of those bad phenomena in the "Cultural Revolution", which is the real "ultra-left" thing.
It just doesn't look at the problem in two, it is deliberately trying to take people into the ditch.
On the other hand, the so-called "emergence of the Cultural Revolution" and "ultra-leftist ideology flooding the Internet" do not indicate that a considerable number of people are dissatisfied with the status quo?
So, should we ignore, denigrate, and suppress the grievances of these people? Or should we explain some of the current policies, review some of the current mistakes, and try our best to correct them, so as to unite the people and promote everyone to look forward in unity?
It is easy to avoid medical treatment, but it will not solve the problem.
Only by facing up to the problem, solving the problem, and convincing people can it be conducive to the resolution of contradictions, and can people let go of the past and face the future.
In fact, those who "claim to be patriotic, have different views, and often label others" are not only those "ultra-leftist" people who miss the "Cultural Revolution".
On the contrary, those who were denounced as "ultra-left", such as Sima Nan, did not appear to be "ultra-left" compared to the practices of the previous "Cultural Revolution", they were only reasonable.
And those who oppose them are the real "ultra-leftist" practices in the "Cultural Revolution", who are rude at every turn and give people hats.
It is also not true to say that those people "shout and kill all day long, criticize the heavens and the earth, and will oppose the United States, Japan, Europe and other developed countries."
Many so-called "ultra-left" people oppose the United States, Europe and Japan, mainly because they oppose their political policies, not against their people.
Those who oppose the West and Japan are precisely those who have ulterior motives and deliberately confuse the public.
"The era of large collectives and the planning system" is a piece of history. History should be viewed in two parts. There are some things in history that need to be criticized, lessons to be learned, and some things that are worth remembering and singing.
"Private entrepreneurs" are a group. There are good and bad people in the group. Some "private entrepreneurs" have indeed smeared the group of private entrepreneurs, and it is not impossible to expose and criticize these so-called "private entrepreneurs". The "market economy" must have a legal system, and some "market economy" that has gone beyond the limits of the legal system should also be exposed and criticized.
To say that some people "like to worship" is very sour.
It's not "worship," it's nostalgia—some people are alive and they're dead, and some people are dead and he's still alive.
