It's incredible! A man rented a factory to others, others actually subleased the factory to four companies, and a fire also burned down his factory, he stupidly waited for compensation, but the tenant sued him, and the man was angry.
Mr. Huang's family is rich, and he has a large factory of more than 16,000 square meters, which is a veritable local tyrant in the local area, but he did not expect that a fire would cost him more than 10 million yuan.
In January 2020, the raging fire shocked everyone, and after the fire was extinguished, it not only caused Mr. Huang to lose more than 20 million yuan, but also caused the shoe company that rented the factory to lose more than 95.6 million yuan, which was a very heavy loss.
And Mr. Huang saw that the factory he had worked so hard to build was destroyed in one fell swoop, and he was so worried that he couldn't sleep all night.
He waited for compensation, but the other party also suffered heavy losses, and he didn't know if the other party could afford to compensate for his factory.
But the factory is his hard work, and it is also an important source of his economy, worth tens of millions, if the other party does not compensate, where is he raising tens of millions to rebuild the factory!
However, Mr. Huang believes that in any case, the tenant should compensate for the fire caused by it.
However, what he didn't expect was that the tenant not only did not compensate, but sued him.
The tenant believes that the factory belongs to Mr. Huang, and a fire broke out in the factory, resulting in a loss of more than 9,560 yuan, so the landlord should compensate him for the loss. The result of the court was even more unacceptable to Mr. Wong, and the court ruled that he should pay 25% compensation to the tenant and the tenant should pay him 75%.
Since Mr. Huang's loss was smaller than that of the shoe company, Mr. Huang had to compensate the other party more than 10 million yuan.
As a result, Mr. Huang collapsed, and he obviously rented the factory to the other party, but he had to bear the problems himself, which he thought was unreasonable, so he appealed.
So does Mr. Huang need to be compensated?
Since Mr. Huang had leased the factory to the tenant, whether Mr. Huang should pay compensation in the event of a fire in the factory was subject to the agreement between them.
Article 509 of the Civil Code stipulates that the parties shall fully perform their obligations in accordance with the agreement. The parties shall follow the principle of good faith and perform obligations such as notification, assistance, and confidentiality in accordance with the nature, purpose, and transaction habits of the contract.
If Mr. Huang agrees to maintain the factory during the lease period, and Mr. Huang fulfills the corresponding obligations, then he does not need to compensate, and the tenant should compensate him.
On the contrary, if Mr. Huang's failure to fulfill the corresponding obligations was the indirect cause of the fire, then he should also bear the corresponding responsibility for the fire. #数千万厂房被烧反赔租客千万#
Therefore, it is important to sign an agreement, whether it is a landlord or a tenant, it is important to make the relevant matters clear when signing the agreement.
