Lies are vulnerable in the face of technology!
I just read Tesla's explanation of the high-speed accident at Beijing Airport, summed up in one sentence: the owner of the throttle when the brakes caused the accident, but to find the media exposure to blackmail the car factory, did not expect to be hit by EDR and background data.
Regarding the "Tesla rear-end accident" on the second highway of Beijing Airport, Tesla released a situation note to the media and disclosed more insider information. Ah Ben first draws the point:
1. Operation error: The driver slammed the accelerator pedal sharply, resulting in an accident.
2. Extortion: Due to the price difference between the amount of insurance claims and the price at the time of purchase, the parties ask Tesla to make up the difference, otherwise they will find media exposure and publish a number of Tesla "brake failure" false information on social platforms.
3. EDR restores the truth: Under the joint witness of the four parties, the on-site EDR data retrieval of the accident vehicle was carried out. The results showed that the EDR data was consistent with the conclusion of the background data analysis.
Netizen: Even if the owner is really the throttle as a brake, then you have not thought about it, why do you open tesla so many throttle as brake cases, while other cars (including oil vehicles) are very few, is this not a problem of the design of the vehicle itself?
Netizen: The Tesla incident should be over, since the Henan car has been in trouble, it can be drawn a Huai confirmation conclusion, that is, the vehicle brakes are no problem, the problem is only the accident caused by the driving habits of the driver.
Netizen: If there are more such accidents, then I think it is necessary to conduct independent third-party training for drivers who buy Tesla or such design models, and they can drive after they are qualified.
Netizen: The car has design flaws that change people's habits and instincts. Many accident manufacturers have said that the driver misoperated, bringing safety hazards to the driver and passengers. Shouldn't the relevant authorities require manufacturers to carry out a recall?