Looking at the world's major enterprises, basically rely on the global supply chain cooperation to develop, there are hardware cooperation, there are also software cooperation, but also there are patent cross-licensing, even if the supply chain capabilities are as strong as Samsung, lithography machines, raw materials and other aspects also need other enterprises to supply. This situation should be a state of development that is balanced with each other, but some people want to break this balance.
U.S. companies pit themselves
From the original Huawei 5G to today's Russian companies facing supply cuts, all kinds of situations actually show one thing, the technology is someone else's, that is, facing huge risks, especially the technology of US companies. For example, key companies such as Oracle and Microsoft suspended services to local enterprises, and even game platforms stopped their local payment systems. There is no doubt that this situation is a shock to the local market, but at the same time it is also a kind of reaction to US companies.
Why? Because the relevant local departments unblocked the most famous resource website, although users cannot use genuine products, they can obtain cracked resources. There is no doubt that this move is bad news for software service companies, such as Microsoft is one of the "victims", not to mention major game developers.
Russian companies expressed their position on Hongmeng, and Huawei responded positively
Not only that, after Apple stopped shipping to the local market, the local market was only available for Android. But recently, Google has also officially sent news that it will stop certifying mobile phones running Android systems, which means that a number of Android phones may also be affected. In this case, the relevant personnel of the Russian company BQ said that Huawei's Hongmeng system is currently being tested, and it is expected to launch related products equipped with Hongmeng system in the second half of the year.
However, for this matter, Huawei officials also made a positive response. Huawei personnel said in an interview that Hongmeng currently has 220 million devices, but there are no plans to launch mobile phones equipped with Harmony OS overseas.
It may not be that simple
On one side are the executives of local companies, and on the other side is the positive response of Huawei. Many people are a little confused, why are the two statements not uniform? In fact, Huawei's attitude and the attitude of executives personally do not conflict. Because Huawei only responded positively, saying that it did not plan to launch mobile phones equipped with Harmony OS systems overseas, but did not explain that other companies would not choose to use them.
We all know that the current supply of Huawei chips is already insufficient, the most important domestic market is facing a decline in shipments, and it is even more difficult for the outside market to supply. Therefore, it is reasonable that Huawei did not personally launch a smartphone equipped with the Hongmeng system. The attitude of Russian executives is that they are currently testing the Hongmeng system, and if feasible, in the future, BQ will launch a mobile phone equipped with the Hongmeng system. This relationship is equivalent to Huawei playing the role of Google, while BQ plays a third-party manufacturer, but Huawei will not personally launch Hongmeng mobile phones to overseas markets.
This development route is personally considered to be the most suitable for Huawei, because it can minimize risks and costs. Because only the authorized system and their own mobile phones are equipped with the Hongmeng system, the cost gap between the two can be imagined.
So obviously, as some foreign media have said, many companies have suffered repercussions in this incident, and Google is naturally no exception. Through this assist, perhaps the Hongmeng system is really going to succeed in the position. What do you think?