Reading more thoughts naturally changes
Author: Criticism of Reason
Recently, Zhao Yanjing, a professor at Xiamen University, proposed that the birth of children be linked to affordable housing and pensions, rewarding those who have children and punishing those who do not have children.
At the 18th (2021) Blue Chip Annual Conference, Zhao Yanjing said that the original birth of children was because the children were directly related to cash flow, and one more child in the family would earn an extra salary.
He said that now we should link the birth of children with capital, the birth of children and the lack of children, social security, pensions should be different, do not have children, there is no affordable housing, people who do not have children compared to those who have children, the share of capital will decline. Only by creating such a mechanism to make having children meaningful will people be more willing.
After the news came out, netizens said that they really couldn't believe that this was a statement made by a university professor in public.
Question 1: Is having one more child linked to social security support, and do you still need work performance?
The performance mechanism of any enterprise and employer is based on the performance of individual ability as the main reference standard.
It is illogical to associate childbearing with security.
Regardless of the actual business ability and work performance of employees, having one more child earns more security, and those who do not have the ability to work can earn more protection by having more children.
This in itself is unfair competition at work.
What's more, what does having one more child have to do with the business?
It should be known that the five insurances and one gold of employees, in addition to the employees themselves to deduct the relevant expenses, the enterprise also has to bear the relevant costs.
May I ask, what benefits does this extra child bring to the enterprise?
Question two: Can one more child be born to become a talent?
The uneven level of education across the country has made many parents anxious.
Children start rolling up from kindergarten.
The more remote and economically underdeveloped areas there are, the more people are delusional about having one more child to increase the probability of survival, thereby improving existing poverty.
Realistically, education is the effective way to change your life.
How many left-behind children are there in the country now? Have the resulting social problems been solved?
One more child grows up in a sound family if they do not receive a good education.
What are the probabilities of him growing up to be a talent?
Question three: having more children can be solved, and the "men" in recruitment are preferred
The reason why enterprises are reluctant to recruit female employees is mainly because childbirth will affect the distribution of work.
Many companies' KPIs are directly linked to their compilations.
Maternity leave for female employees is negative to the efficiency of the work of the whole team.
Female employees lose their original positions after giving birth, and who is responsible for the decline of their careers?
In the family division of labor, it is the current social situation that women have more energy to take care of children than men.
Recruitment discrimination has always existed, regardless of the feelings of the reproductive subject, using fertility as a chip of interests, is this not objectifying women?
Question Four: Is it meaningful only to get married and have children?
Can't afford to be born, can't afford to be raised. It is the mantra of some young people now.
Social competition is fierce, and migrant workers in foreign lands are doing their best to stay in the big cities.
If you are trapped in a marriage without quality for a lifetime for a set of affordable housing, is this not the sadness of society?
Having faith in marriage and having a reverential heart is the mentality of being responsible for people.
Having children is not for the elderly, for the sake of profit, for the sake of succession.
In the process of raising children, parents need to grow, and they are also learning how to be parents step by step.
Can the burden of raising children be solved by social security and pension?
The proposal to shake the will not to have children by taking away the benefits and thus increasing the fertility rate is really subjective.
In developed countries with negative population growth, countries tend to adopt welfare policies that reward families with multiple births in order to increase fertility rates, but it has never been heard of any country that punishes those who do not have children.
Featured articles