【Yao Haitao】 Teacher Lin, "Xunzi DayiLu" (one volume), Gu Zongyi's "Xunzi New Book Collection" four volumes, Beihai Bookstore has a collection? Precious bibliography, Hazel Bibliography.
【Lin Guihao】Whose great righteousness? Xue Bing's, there is. Gu Shu, I had never heard of it, and I was lonely.
[Yao Haitao] I also stumbled upon the book and saw it. It is Xue Bing's "Record of Great Righteousness".
[Lin Guihao] is actually the "Great Righteous Narrative", because I have not seen the original book, so it is wrong. This book is only a single volume, and mine is a copy of the collection. Professor Liu Guirong's "On Xun JiJiao" quoted this bibliography of what is the Cui Ge.
[Yao Haitao] is from the "China Book Series Review". I'm also looking at second-hand information.
[Yao Haitao] is this. I'll give you an academic assistant, which is more appropriate. Ha ha.
[Yao Haitao] The books are basically cited as "Xunzi Dayilu", according to Lin's collection, it should be "Xunzi DayiShu". The humble text "Xunzi "And" on the Great Righteousness" once used the title of "Great Righteous Narrative", and Teacher Wang Guoming remembered the "Spring and Autumn Great Righteous Narrative", and there was originally a more recent "Xunzi Dayi Narrative".
[Lin Guihao] Literacy is a typo, it is just a literacy error or has not seen the original book. Cai Yuanpei's diary seems to be recorded as "Xunzi Dayi Shu" correctly.
[Yao Haitao] Cai Yuanpei will certainly not be wrong. On the left is The Dragon. When described. You baby, when to sort out and publish, if the number of words is not much, let the journal be published.
[Lin Guihao] Play by yourself, what hair. The two of them are related, and Xue Bing seems to be a little older, but the specifics have not been examined. Like Jiang Zhongkui's "Xunzi Sexual Evidence", it is very novel and has some value.
[Yao Haitao] The following are all "description" characters.
[Lin Guihao] I have already corrected the information of Xue Shu, some people in the academic circles have misquoted, the author is also wrong, and even the title of the book is also wrong, that is, the foot of the horse that plagiarizes in time. Japanese books, there are also cases, do not check, just copy, check, horse's foot.