Kim Dong-hee's bullying incident has reversed! "No suspicion" is a false positive

Actor Kim Dong-hee's allegations of school violence (school violence) have been revealed to be true.

Actor Kim Dong-hee's suspicion of bullying in school was confirmed as a fact.

On November 12, Sports Kyunghyang reported that Kim Tong-hee obtained a notice of reasons for the violation of the law (defamation) against Mr. A, a debunked debunchist, on promotion of information and communications network use and information protection.

On the 12th, sportskhan exclusively reported a notice, (the notice can be understood) Kim Dong-hee to disclose the campus violence A as the target, put forward a complaint of violating the information and communication network use promotion law, information protection act (defamatory), but the complaint was sentenced to non-prosecution punishment (no suspicion), from the notice can know the reason for such a sentence.

The notice released by the media contains the reason why Kim Tong-hee was cleared of charges of defamation in the event of false misconduct against Mr. A for insufficient evidence. Mr A was assaulted by Kim Dong-hee in the fifth grade of primary school and claimed he was threatened with murder with scissors or a cutter. In response, Kim Tong-hee acknowledged some of Mr. A's claims, but countered that the level was different.

It can be seen from the notice published by the media that Kim Dong-hee sued A for creating false facts and destroying the name, which failed due to insufficient evidence, and A was found to be unsuspecting, and the reasons for such a judgment can be seen in the notice. A advocate was violently abused by Kim Dong-hee in the 5th grade of elementary school, and was threatened by Kim Dong-hee with scissors and paper cutters. In this regard, although Kim Dong-hee acknowledged some of A's claims, he refuted that the bullying scale was not as A said.

It claims that 'the accused assaulted the accused in the fifth grade of elementary school, and he never held scissors or cutters as the accused had timely manner, and he had never done so, and even though it was an assault to the extent that he pushed the victim and pushed his chest area with his feet, he misrepresented the accused's defamation for the purpose of defaming the accused.'

Kim Dong-hee argued: "Although it is true that the prosecutor committed atrocities against the defendant in the 5th grade of elementary school, he did not use the scissors or paper cutting knives mentioned by the defendant, and he did not even pretend to be in his hand." It was just a matter of pushing the victim hard and putting his foot down his chest. However, the defendant, for the purpose of defamation, displayed false facts and damaged the reputation of the prosecutor. ”

At the time, Mr. A submitted a number of statements and a nocturnal record of Mr. B, who was a sympathetic man, claiming, "I received an apology from the rapport as an elementary school representative because of the fact of Kim Dong-hee's assault," and that "Kim Dong-hee and his mom came home and apologized."

At that time, A claimed that "because of Kim Dong-hee's atrocities, the school supervisor and the primary school representatives all came to apologize to me", "Kim Dong-hee and his mother also came to my home to apologize", and B, who was the school supervisor, submitted the recording and content statement.

The prosecution deemed mr. A's claims false, and said it was difficult to admit to the allegations that he had the purpose of defaming Kim Dong-hee, and that he had "no evidence" to charge Mr. A with "insufficient evidence." When the matter came to the fore, Kim Tong-hee, the legal counsel, made an official admission on December 28 last year. However, the process resulted in an error that was sent out as a "charge of abuse" rather than a "no defamation charge."

The prosecution judged that it was difficult to confirm that A's claim was false, and it was also difficult to agree that A was doing this to defame Kim Dong-hee. Therefore, on the grounds of "insufficient evidence", the "no suspicion" non-prosecution punishment was given for A's claim of defamation. After the unsuspecting sanctions for the relevant incidents were issued, the legal representative of Kim Dong-hee issued an official position on December 28, 2021. However, there was an error in the transmission process, changing "no suspicion of dishonorability" into "suspicion of not inflicting violence in schools".

At the time, Kim Tong-hee said in an official position, "We tried to determine the facts through law enforcement agencies about the allegations posted online in February. In the process, kim Tong-hee submitted statements from his accusers, affidavits from teachers and alumni friends, and records of life in elementary and secondary schools, but it was a long time ago in elementary school, and there was no clear evidence to support each other's differences in positions and claims, so the investigation resulted in no charges, and "the suspicion that the investigation of the charges is not true."

At that time, Kim Dong-hee issued an official position saying: "For the doubts raised on the Internet in February this year (2021), we have long hoped to grasp the facts through the judicial organs. In the process, Kim Dong-hee's own complaint statement, the statements of teachers and classmates, and copies of elementary and junior high school life records were submitted. However, because too much time has passed, this is what happened in elementary school, there is no clear evidence to support each other's different positions and propositions, and the final result is no suspicion", "However, the investigation results of the survey as 'no suspicion' do not mean that the doubts raised on the Internet are not facts." ”

In the process, Kim Tong-hee did not mention the background and reasons for the charges being dropped, without elabiing about the allegations of "defamation." Because Kim Tong-hee emphasized only "no charges," some observers say that he did not intentionally provide the possession of a mistaken person who had been charged by the academics.

In this process, Kim Dong-hee did not specify that the suspicion was proposed for "defamation", nor did it mention the background and reason for the unsuspecting punishment. Since Kim Dong-hee only emphasizes "no suspicion", some people think that this is not a deliberate attempt to lead everyone to feel that Kim Dong-hee is not suspected of committing campus violence.

Earlier, in February last year, an online article was published identifying Kim Dong-hee as the "perpetrator of the school bombing." In response, Kim Tong-hee's affiliate stated, "The article about Kim Dong-hee, which is being circulated, was first published in 2018, and after checking the facts with the actor himself and the school officials at the time, he confirmed that there was nothing related to school violence."

Earlier, in February last year, the Internet published a disclosure text pointing to Kim Dong-hee as a "perpetrator of school violence.". In this regard, Kim Dong-hee's agency issued a position saying: "The spread of posts about Kim Dong-hee was first uploaded in 2018, when the agency and the actor himself and the school-related people confirmed the facts, and the result was that Kim Dong-hee did not carry out campus violence." ”

However, the controversy escalated when additional testimony was released to Kim Dong-hee that had been damaged.

However, the controversy grew even greater after additional testimonies of the violent injuries to the campus were made public because of Kim Dong-hee.

Key vocabulary

커터칼【Noun】Art knife, paper cutting knife

수위【Noun】 Level, level

고소인【Noun】 Prosecutor, accuser

밀치다 [verb] Push hard, push hard

교감[Noun] School Supervisor, Director of Teaching

Emphasis on grammar

- There have been/no enemies

Used after the verb to indicate "have you experienced it in the past"

I've never travelled abroad.

I have not traveled overseas.

Now, thinking, he is someone I've met before.

Now that I think about it, I've seen him once before.

- I'm going to

The preceding words cannot be timed, only verbs are used to indicate intention. The verbs that follow it are mainly "하다,생각하다,계획하다,들다" and other verbs. In particular, it is often combined with "하다" to form "려고 하다". Form a purposeful adjective in a sentence. It is equivalent to the Chinese "want to..." and "want".

I try to learn a foreign language.

I want to learn Chinese.

He doesn't go there.

He didn't want to go there.