laitimes

Is Ao bai a traitor or a loyal servant?

The story of the Qing Dynasty is the most talked about, but the facts of history and the stories that are passed down by the population today are not completely consistent, for example, Aobai has always been called a traitor, but do you know that he is loyal and difficult to distinguish?

Is Ao bai a traitor or a loyal servant?

During the Manchu Qing Dynasty, he made great achievements and military merits, known as the first warrior of Manchuria, and was also loyal to the Manchu Qing. In the second year of Chongdeok (1637), the Qing army attacked Phi Dao (now Linden Island, Korea), an important base of the Ming army in Liaodong Province, and the Ming army waited in a strict position, with artillery fire firing in unison, and the situation was urgent. With brute force, Ao Bai bravely rushed to kill, was the first to land on the island, and engaged in close hand-to-hand combat with the Ming army. After Phi Dao was conquered, Ao Bai was a hero of this battle, and Emperor Taiji named him a third-class male and gave him the title of "Baturu" (warrior). After that, Ao bai made many military achievements, ranked as the commander of the protective army, and was a figure with a high status among the generals of the Eight Banners.

Is Ao bai a traitor or a loyal servant?

Friends who have seen "Deer Ding" should have a deep impression of this person. Because he was the first major trouble that the Kangxi Emperor and Wei Xiaobao had joined forces to eliminate, it was precisely because of the joint conspiracy to get rid of the friendship of Aobai that the friendship between Kangxi and Wei Xiaobao quickly warmed up, and he could be called a confidant. What kind of person in history is the bearded, burly, armed, and brainless Ao bai on TV? Ao bai, surnamed Guarjia, was a Manchurian yellow flag bearer and the third son of Wei Qi. Their family can be called a meritorious family, uncle Fei Yingdong followed Nurhaci in his early years, was one of the founding fathers of the Qing Dynasty, and the second brother Zhuo Butai was also a military general with outstanding military achievements in the early Qing Dynasty. And he himself followed Huang Taiji to conquer various places, and his military achievements were outstanding, and he was Huang Taiji's confidant.

Is Ao bai a traitor or a loyal servant?

Influenced by some film and television dramas, people today are a traitor to Aobai who opposes the emperor, and some people even think that Aobai wants to usurp the throne. First of all, TV drama is an art of recreating history, and the screenwriter who writes the script may not know the real history. Even if you know that piece of history, sometimes in order to attract the attention of the audience, you will arbitrarily enlarge the existing facts, which is normal. Therefore, when we watch historical TV dramas, we can only look at the plot as a story, and should not be regarded as a real historical reproduction.

Is Ao bai a traitor or a loyal servant?

In 1661, the Shunzhi Emperor died of illness in the Yangxin Temple, and the 8-year-old crown prince Xuan Ye took the throne as emperor. According to the shunzhi emperor's will, the state affairs were administered by the four auxiliary ministers of Sonny, Shubilong, Suksaha, and Aobai. However, the Shunzhi Emperor never expected that with the passage of time for the auxiliary government and the growth of the Kangxi Emperor, the contradiction between the Kangxi Emperor and the auxiliary ministers became increasingly fierce! Among the four auxiliary ministers, the one who gradually monopolized power was Ao Bai!

Is Ao bai a traitor or a loyal servant?

The reason for Ao bai's eventual conviction was that he had formed a party for personal gain and arbitrarily abused power, which hindered the high concentration of imperial power and formed a strong contradiction with the monarch's arbitrariness, rather than that he was suspected of rebellion and usurpation.

It can be seen that in fact, the historical truth cannot be corresponded to one by one by the current circulation, and we should look at history objectively, rather than judging through TV dramas, film and television works.

Read on