IT Home January 3 news, with the VR-HUD class of head-up display technology in the car application gradually increased, many people think that VR equipment will replace the car screen. In this regard, Li Xiang, the founder of Ideal Auto, has a different attitude, he said: "Before defining the product, please make sure that you have the most basic VR theoretical knowledge and sufficient experience. ”
Ideal Auto CEO Li wants to believe that product managers should have more basic product knowledge and awe, do not easily mislead consumers with concepts, and do not arbitrarily define those products that they have not used at all.
The original words are as follows:
Recently, there has been a view that after having VR equipment, there is no need for a screen in the car. My point: Don't easily define products that you haven't even used. As a qualified product manager, it is important to ensure that you have the most basic theoretical knowledge of VR and sufficient experience before defining the product. Be sure to think more about the user's basic life scenarios and ask yourself more why.
1. How to effectively position vr equipment during vehicle driving? Includes positioning requirements for the co-pilot and rear. Vr positioning is the most basic problem Consumers have not thought it is normal, and product managers do not want to?
2. Can the mainstream 8155 computing power on the car drive medium-resolution VR devices and at least two screens of car applications at the same time?
3. If the medium and long distance can not be used, but the vehicle is stationary to use, who uses who in the car does not use? If the vehicle can only be used when it is stopped, why not use the VR device for 3D interaction at home?
4. What car has enough space to support basic 3D interactions for 6Dof or 3Dof applications? Why use VR for non-3D interaction?
5, if it is only a headset function, in addition to more damage to vision and more motion sickness (driving) these two points, it and holding an iPad what is the difference? Why can't the headset that has been sold for many years not catch fire?
Don't easily mislead consumers with concepts, and don't arbitrarily define products that you haven't used at all.
I support all car companies' attempts and explorations of VR, and every company should work the road of innovative experience. However, misleading consumers about screen uselessness before any function is implemented, I think it lacks the most basic product common sense and reverence.
For making products, please have more basic reverence and kneel down!
It is reported that NIO previously launched the ET5, which is also the first VR/AR experience native design model, through NIO Air AR Glasses and NIO VR Glasses to bring AR and VR to the car. Li Bin said: "My dream has always been to eliminate the screen in the car, and now I am one step closer to this goal. ”
Therefore, recently some netizens on the Internet have heard a voice: a certain flagship model of Weilai will change the screen in the car to AR / VR design after NIO Day, so Li wants to discuss this kind of person.
Huawei has also previously announced its consumer business strategic layout, called 1+8+N, which is a mobile phone, 8 represents tablets, PCs, VR devices, wearable devices, smart screens, smart audio, smart speakers, and car machines, and N represents pan-IoT devices. Therefore, some users believe that Huawei will connect these areas.