Recently, some netizens broke the news that the big melon of the members of the Deyun Society pointed directly at member Zhang Jiunan. A netizen named "Chocolate Taro Round Milk" claimed to be Zhang Jiunan's ex-wife and posted a large number of screenshots of chat records with Zhang Jiunan. In the chat record, the "chocolate taro round milk" asked Zhang Jiunan for education funds and housing loans, but the party Zhang Jiunan's attitude has always been very cold, and many times he chooses not to respond.
Deyun Society out of the moth is not once or twice, many netizens online in the comment area to honestly say that the cross-talk people are more reliable. Many netizens pointed out that saying that crosstalk is reliable, never rely on the screen to believe in a person, good people and bad people only have a "line between bursting out and not bursting out." ”
The posting on the Internet did not provoke much splash, so the woman's "chocolate taro round milk" angrily exposed the man's behavior in the super words of Theokun Society. But unfortunately, this time it still failed to attract the attention of many melon-eating masses, and there was no heat at all.
Compared with a series of incidents by the sister-in-law's hammer man, netizens "chocolate taro round milk" also seem to want to use such incidents to ferment public opinion, but she seems to have miscalculated. In the previous incidents, the "Thor's Hammer" of the woman on the exposed party had more clear evidence and direction, and the chat records she exposed were not painful, there was no empirical "hammer", so it could not provoke a big splash.
Zhang Jiunan's ex-wife Post pointed out that the son was born by the two of them, not by one person. And in the blog post, he pointed out zhang Jiunan's derailment, and put forward the statement that even if he cheated, he would be responsible for the child. The education expenses for the children need to be borne by her and Zhang Jiunan together, in addition to the house loan. The education expenses of the son include thinking classes, hip-hop classes, English classes, art classes and other course fees. All the costs added up to nearly 40,000 yuan, and Zhang Jiunan only bore 3140 + 1880 yuan.
Zhang Jiunan's ex-wife bitterly criticized Zhang Jiunan as an irresponsible husband, and even if divorced, he should bear the mortgage and his son's education funds together. Criticize him for standing on the stage glamorous, but calculating their mother and daughter offstage. How many times of discussion, all that awaited him was his indifferent response and ridicule.
But many fans of Zhang Jiunan do not think so, and they should be on the side of the idol. Some fans pointed out: "Now we all know that pit stars can make money, and it is not a matter of hundreds of millions of dollars at all." The woman has repeatedly said that she wants to post evidence, but there is no substantial evidence, but instead asks the man for money in the name of the child, just to make some money. ”
Many netizens remain neutral on this incident, and some people feel that "either the first voice is right", and there is substantial evidence to stand on the commanding heights of public opinion. According to the requirements of our law, even if the husband and wife divorce and the woman raises the child, the man should pay the maintenance fee, rather than ignoring the turtle. If the parties do not divorce, the spouses should share the costs of the family (mortgage and children's education expenses). This law is universal to both men and women and no one is exempt from liability.
On the afternoon of the same day, Zhang Jiunan responded: Last year, the two sides had sued for divorce and held a trial, and the situation said by netizens "chocolate taro round milk" was not true. The two sides have no marital feelings, but they are not enemies, and they do not want to further hurt the children and their families and expand the impact of the matter.
Zhang Jiunan's ex-wife has published more than a dozen blog posts in succession, trying to prove her innocence, feeling unhappy at the false slander of the man's fans, and bothering him to eat melon to contact the context.
But no matter what the facts are, it seems that children should not be told about things, and children who are involved in the storm of public opinion do not know how to feel. Right and wrong are left to the law to decide, evidence is laid out, and questions are answered. If you want to hammer the scumbag, you should put forward strong evidence to show everyone the verdict of the court, so that netizens can determine the truth of the facts.