Here I would like to talk about the famous "Tsinghua Jane". "Qinghua Jane" is 2388 pieces of bamboo jane in the middle and late Warring States period, which is a rare book cultural relics of the early Qin Dynasty. As soon as "Tsinghua Jane" appeared, it set off a wave of "history we have learned" operations.
"Qinghua Jane" punches the face of "Beacon Theatre Princes", proving that "Beacon Theatre Princes" did not exist at all.
"Qinghua Jian" slaps the face of the historical statement that "Hu Hai's succession to the throne is a conspiracy of Zhao Gao and Li Si", and Hu Hai was recognized by Qin Shi Huang before his death and succeeded to the throne normally.
"Qinghua Jane" hit the face of the "Shang Shu" controversy, and the earliest version of the "Ancient Literature Shangshu" appeared in the "Qinghua Jian", which proved that the "Shang Shu" that people have been seeing is a cottage.
For a time, people thought that the historical, cultural, and academic value of "Qinghua Jian" was immeasurable, at least it was no different from the Kizuka Book (there was "The Year of the Bamboo Secretary" in the Kizuka Book).
More than that, some of the history interpreted by "Tsinghua Jian" directly appeared in the case of the "Xia Shang Zhou Dynasty Project". What's going on here?
First, the Xia Shang Zhou Dynasty project desperately wanted to prove the existence of the "Xia Dynasty". And the first part of the "Qinghua Jane" sorted out the bamboo Jane, there is a "Baoxun" recorded the will of King Wen of Zhou to King Wu of Zhou, in the will, King Wen of Zhou talked about Yao Shun, and also talked about the Shang Dynasty, but did not mention the Xia Dynasty.
Second, as recorded in the Qinghua Jian and Baoxun, King Wen of Zhou reigned for 50 years, then the 35th year of King Wen of Zhou was 1071 BC. According to the "Book of Yi Zhou", in the 35th year of King Wen of Zhou, there was a lunar eclipse of the first lunar month. King Wu was cut down in 1046 BC, 11 years after the death of King Wen of Zhou.
The "Xia Shang Zhou Dynasty Project Series" argues that in the years before and after 1071 BC, there was no "lunar eclipse of the first month".
There are serious differences between the "Qinghua Jian", the Yi Zhou Shu, and the Xia Shang Zhou Dynasty Project, and there are mutual falsifications, who has a problem? Solar eclipses and lunar eclipses are the major events that must be recorded in ancient times, and whether or not "Tsinghua Jian" has records are very passive.
Originally, there was a lot of controversy about the "Xia Shang Zhou Dynasty Project", and the doubt about the authenticity of "Tsinghua Jane" has always existed. The authenticity identification process of Tsinghua Jane and the origin of Tsinghua Jane have always been questioned.
If "Tsinghua Jian" is fake, it is another academic fraud scandal; if there is a problem with the Xia Shang Zhou Dynasty Project, then it is the collapse of the entire system. I'm terrified when I think about it!