At the press conference, Li Bin made it clear that et5's opponents are two 3s, one is bmw 3 series, and the other is Tesla's Model 3.
In terms of pricing, ET5 has also shown its attitude, the new car is priced at 328,000, 386,000 versions, strictly speaking, the pricing is higher than the two 3s.
Of course, Weilai is also using its own configuration and sincerity to enhance the competitiveness of car purchases, for example, the new car has no low-end, and the whole series is a dual-motor performance version of the model.
If you only look at the book data, behind the cold parameters of ET5 is a strong data support.
For example, the dual motors can synergistically output 490 horsepower and 700 Nm of maximum torque, ensuring a 100 km/h acceleration of 4.3 seconds, while the 328,000 entry-level models, equipped with 75kWh battery packs, can ensure the 550km endurance under the CLTC test standard.
It seems that the strength is not weak.
However, nothing can be compared, get a piece of a comparison will have a high and low points, for example, Li Bin said that ET5 to benchmark the Model3, the same price can buy the Performance version.
Model3 Performance guidance price of 339,900, more than the price of the entry-level VERSION of ET5 is more than 10,000, the product to get a piece of comparison, you can find differentiation.
Tesla's performance car motor horsepower 486Ps, torque 659 Nm, the book data is weaker than the NIO ET5, the torque is 41 Nm less, the horsepower is 4Ps lower, but it is worth mentioning that the acceleration performance is a full second faster.
Although the size of the ET5 is about 10cm larger than the Model 3, Tesla's acceleration performance is a full second faster in the case of weaker book data, and this huge gap is not a sentence that ET5 is heavier to round back.
Because everyone knows that on the basis of 4 seconds of acceleration, it is necessary to upgrade in coordination with all aspects, not simply looking at the weight, not to mention, the 10cm body size gap will not be too much difference in the strict sense of quality.
Not only the performance gap, but also the endurance gap is also very large.
Tesla Model3 Performance battery pack is 78kWh, while ET5 is 75kWh, the two models in the battery pack capacity gap of only 3kWh, theoretically counting the quality gap, ET5 is at most shorter than the Model3Performance on the 30km-50km shorter.
However, Tesla's calibration endurance is 675km, while the NIO ET5's cruising range is only 550km, a gap of 125km.
In simple terms, the ET5 is allowed to have more mass at larger sizes, but the ET5, with more motor horsepower, is exactly one second slower than Performance in performance.
Not only that, the battery pack capacity is almost the same for the two models, Tesla's calibration range, but also 125km longer than the WEILAI ET5.
The price of Tesla is only a little more than ten thousand more expensive than the WEILAI ET5.
I think the gap behind this is not explained by parameters, the differentiation of the core electronic control architecture system, the differentiation of the motor system and the differentiation of the battery management system can directly open the gap between the two models.
We can't say that Weilai has been stacking configurations and stacking battery capacity, after all, in essence, Weilai also wants to do a good job in this new model, but what we should think about is that the same price, the same thing, why Tesla can be thrown away by ET5 in parameters, performance, endurance can be fully surpassed.
Why, exactly?